[dragnet2]

Or are you claiming that I said I had evidence against every single UFO sighting in history?

Here is what you stated in 210.

Unlike the UFO question, where there is evidence against alien origin, yet none supporting it.

210 posted on 11/14/2007 10:18:34 AM PST by GunRunner (Thompson 2008 - Security, Unity, Prosperity) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Could you explain? Are you saying there is evidence against 1 sighting, 10 percent, 99 percent.

Remember what I said about you talking in circles?

What exactly do you mean. All? Some? None?

What are you taking about in regards to evidence?

Thanks.

[GunRunner]

What exactly do you mean. All? Some? None?

What are you taking about in regards to evidence?

No reasonable person could possibly assume that I was implying that I had evidence debunking every individual UFO sighting in history.

The evidence I was referring to are the many cases of UFO sightings being proven to be non-alien in origin; either hoaxes, misidentified earthly phenomena, or other aircraft.

Here's the contrast:

The burden of proof on a skeptic is to provide proof of hoaxes and false sightings, which has been done many hundreds of times over, versus the UFO believers, who have no evidence whatsoever that UFO are alien craft.

[Do Be]

Hey, Dragnet. Have you read the damn $5 book yet?

Apparently once you have done so, the mystery will be resolved so please get to it.

WE haven't got all day.