I don't have evidence for EVERY SINGLE sighting, just like I can't debunk every Bigfoot, Nessie, or leprechaun sighting. I've given you a reasonable basis for my point of view, and nothing you've said comes close to convincing me otherwise. There is a multitude of evidence for UFOs being explained as earthly phenomena, and ZERO evidence for anything extraterrestrial. If there are two possibilities, I will go with the more reasonable one.
So some pilots have seen some strange things in the sky; there's also pilots that say September 11th was an inside job and that a plane never hit the Pentagon. Are you inclined to believe them as well?
I don’t have evidence for EVERY SINGLE sighting, just like I can’t debunk every Bigfoot, Nessie, or leprechaun sighting....
***See my post #213. That’s why I won’t sign up for this nonsense about explaining *ALL* because then that is what the ET crowd will focus on. It’s essentially a form of straw argumentation. What can be explained is the great majority of events, and in light of those explanations the remaining unexplained items do not hold nearly as much weight as they did before the explanation. Let’s say it turns out that 90% of the sightings can be explained by Secret Weapons or natural phenomena. That leaves a few scattered 10% that no longer seem as compelling for the ET hypothesis. You should get Vesco’s book, you’ll like it. It’s right up your ally.
To: GunRunner
OK, just to be clear, are you stating that *all* of these incidents are *all* just witness misinterpretations, optical illusions and secret military craft? YES
***My approach is very similar, but since this is an inductive area, that word *all* is completely misplaced. Once I see “the great majority” replace that word “all”, then that’s when I can say YES.
213 posted on 11/14/2007 10:35:38 AM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]