Is this what you're saying?
YES! Oh my God YES for the 10th time!! That is what I'm saying!
If you think I'm wrong, then provide another possible explanation. Otherwise quit asking, "Is this what you're saying?"
I just wanted to make sure you were referring to *all* or every single incident. No need to blow a gasket. lol.
So once again, you're saying credible professionals in the aviation business, pilots, military personnel and many others are just not capable of providing accurate observations, and they all have just simply misinterpreted what they've witnessed.
OK. lol...
I just don't buy into what you believe in regards to the above. It sounds like a government provided explanation. No offense.
That being said, sure many of these incidents are what you described, however, there have been many others, involving rather high end, top shelf, credible professionals, with detailed, closeup observations on objects that cannot be just explained away, supported by radar tracks, pilots, etc.
OK, just to be clear, are you stating that *all* of these incidents are *all* just witness misinterpretations, optical illusions and secret military craft? YES
***My approach is very similar, but since this is an inductive area, that word *all* is completely misplaced. Once I see “the great majority” replace that word “all”, then that’s when I can say YES.