Skip to comments.
Cosmic ray mystery solved?
Eurekalert | University of Utah ^
| 11/8/07
Posted on 11/12/2007 1:12:47 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: LibWhacker
Cosmic ray mystery solved? Quick! Someone call Dr. Reed Richards!
21
posted on
11/12/2007 2:00:59 PM PST
by
LexBaird
(Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
To: Reily
22
posted on
11/12/2007 2:02:53 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: DBrow; KarlInOhio
And now calculate the velocity of a single iron nucleus at that energy! And don't forget relativistic effects; namely, the faster an object goes, the more massive it gets relative to a slowpoke outside observer.
23
posted on
11/12/2007 2:04:15 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(Democrats are phony Americans)
To: LibWhacker
There are few places, if any, in the universe more violent than the inner accretion disk of a supermassive black hole!
24
posted on
11/12/2007 2:05:48 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
To: Yossarian
25
posted on
11/12/2007 2:07:07 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(Democrats are phony Americans)
To: DBrow
And now calculate the velocity of a single iron nucleus at that energy! Pretty darn fast. I used the relativistic kinetic energy equation and I don't have a calculator with enough precision to give an answer other than the speed of light.
26
posted on
11/12/2007 2:08:20 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
To: piytar
But what about spaghettification?
“Look here brother,
Who you jivin’ with that Cosmik Debris?
(Now is that a real poncho or is that a Sears poncho?)”
To: KarlInOhio
One odd thing about superenergetic particles is that at full energy, they don’t deposit much energy in the materials they traverse. Another way of saying this is that they have low Linear Energy transfer (LET). At lower energies, they deposit more energy per inch (do more damage).
So if you try to shield against them you can make the problem worse! Plus, as you stop it you generate secondaries like xrays and gammas (mesons and muons too for the really hot ones). The low LET at high energy also means that you cannot effectively shield anything, at least not until we can mine asteroids.
As the particle penetrates, it sheds energy faster and faster until it reaches a maximum, the Bragg peak. On the other side of Bragg, the particle loses punch as it passes through.
http://tvdg10.phy.bnl.gov/LETCalc.html
Here is a handy calculator for figuring out LET as a function of particle mass and energy.
28
posted on
11/12/2007 3:00:41 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: Red Badger
Cosmic rays cause global cooling.
29
posted on
11/12/2007 3:09:52 PM PST
by
Chaguito
To: LexBaird
You called?
30
posted on
11/12/2007 3:14:25 PM PST
by
Stonewall Jackson
(The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
To: Chaguito
Unless you get hit in the head by one.......
31
posted on
11/12/2007 3:16:07 PM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson