Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB

and again they assign “red” to the conservative side, to avoid giving it (most appropriately) to the socialist Left.


24 posted on 11/12/2007 11:48:35 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317

oh, you KNOW that was on purpose.

I’ve heard, however, that they alternate the color of the incumbent party every couple of election cycles or some such thing. At least this matches the pattern.

Reagan was blue against Carter and Mondale. Bush 41 was Blue vs Clinton. Dole red vs Clinton. Bush red in 2000 & 2004. It’s time to switch again, I think....


32 posted on 11/12/2007 11:51:47 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317

Red WAS the color of Democrat election victories until the recent elections when the same media that changed the colors made it clear to us WHICH party was now “Red”.


33 posted on 11/12/2007 11:51:51 AM PST by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Teacher317

socialists don’t get a right to own anything, not my property and not the color red, which is one of my favorites. They should get an ugly color, like the color of puke


77 posted on 11/12/2007 12:16:40 PM PST by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson