Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gitmo
They are an environmental nightmare

Mercury in CFL Bulbs

The average CFL bulb manufactured today contains 4mg of mercury. It is an essential part of CFLs without which we would not have such energy-efficient light bulbs. Although it is anything but optimal to have such a toxic material used in the manufacture of a green product, this is no reason not to replace all incandescent bulbs with CFL bulbs at home and in the office.

Why? Because coal-fired power stations emit mercury - and during the average 5 year life of a CFL bulb the electricity generated to power it will have lead to smokestack emissions into the atmosphere of 2.4mg of mercury. Over the same 5 year period the electricity consumed by incandescent bulbs will result in 10mg of emissions. Therefore, even if you factor in the 4mg of mercury contained in the CFL bulb itself, the CFL is still a net winner.

61 posted on 11/11/2007 7:56:12 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: rb22982
“Because coal-fired power stations emit mercury “

My closest power plant does not burn coal, and there is a big nuke down the coast.

So when I throw my 4 mg of Hg in the trash, there is no “offset”, just Hg in the landfill.

So to be green the government would have to issue Gorebulbs only in an amount to compensate for the coal plants and no more, and at that, only to offset the ones that emit the most mercury.

Plus, with a Gorebulb, you are throwing away the little ballast, too. “Old fashioned” fluorescent tech had you keep the ballast and use it for more than one lamp, unlike Gorebulbs.

Take one apart and you’ll find a wee circuit card with an inductor or two, some transistors, and some capacitors, all chucked in the dustbin.

103 posted on 11/11/2007 8:29:21 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: rb22982
The crucial difference is that the CFL releases that 4mg of Hg into my home if it breaks. Than makes all the difference in the world as far as I’m concerned. Given that I have two small boys, I expect bulbs broken on a regular basis. Having them potentially suck in upto 4mg of Hg every time they knock a lamp over is not acceptable.

I have CFLs where I think they are safe. But I want to make the judgment about when and where they are installed, not be dictated to by the government.
141 posted on 11/11/2007 9:38:24 PM PST by Flying Circus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson