Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medal of Honor process under fire
San Diego Union ^ | November 11, 2007 | Steve Liewer

Posted on 11/11/2007 5:52:42 PM PST by radar101

Sgt. Rafael Peralta told his men he would die for them. Then he went out and proved it. Peralta was leading five Marines on a house-clearing mission Nov. 15, 2004, in the second week of a battle for the insurgent stronghold of Fallujah, Iraq. As he entered a room near the back of one home, gunfire hit him in the face and chest, leaving him barely breathing on the floor.

Then a grenade rolled out of the room, landing a foot away from him. Peralta pulled it to his chest so he could shield his men from the blast. He died instantly when the grenade exploded, but the other Marines lived.

Marine Sgt. Rafael Peralta

“It's stuff you hear about in boot camp, about World War II and Tarawa Marines who won the Medal of Honor,” Lance Cpl. Rob Rogers, a witness to Peralta's courageous act, later told The Army Times.

Peralta's heroism has been celebrated on military blogs, in books and in a TV documentary. President Bush has praised Peralta, a 25-year-old San Diegan, for his bravery and sacrifice.

But three years after Peralta gave his life, for which he received a Purple Heart, the Pentagon has yet to acknowledge Peralta's courageous deed with any medal of valor. That he is deserving of a Medal of Honor, the nation's highest award for combat bravery, is widely accepted among his peers. What's puzzling is the delay.

“There are a lot of people scratching their heads. I hope his family is awarded what he deserves soon,” said Owen West, a Marine Reserve officer who served in Iraq in 2003 and now writes military-themed articles and books.

West and other veterans criticize the Pentagon for what they see as an awards process that has become too tough and slow. They contend that bureaucrats far from the combat zones are nitpicking the valor of real-life heroes.

“It's just ridiculous how they're playing parlor games with a guy who gave his life,” David Bellavia said of Peralta. Bellavia, a decorated former Army staff sergeant who fought in Fallujah, has been a vocal critic of the medal selection process.

Pentagon officials said a meticulous, lengthy process is essential to preserving the mystique that surrounds the Medal of Honor.

“To get it right, we've got to make sure the candidates are thoroughly investigated. In a Medal of Honor case, there is no margin for error and no room for doubt,” said Cmdr. Lesley Priest, director of the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals, which supervises high-level awards for the Navy and Marine Corps.

Two people have been recognized with a Medal of Honor since the Iraq war began in 2003. There has been one recipient in the six years of the Afghanistan war.

By comparison, the military awarded 465 Medals of Honor during World War II, 133 during the Korean War and 246 during the Vietnam War, said Doug Sterner of Pueblo, Colo., a Marine veteran of Vietnam. Sterner has created the nation's most comprehensive database of valor-award recipients – even more complete than the Pentagon's – at www.homeofheroes.com.

During the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the time period between an act of valor and a Medal of Honor announcement has been two to three years. Military experts said that in previous conflicts, the interval typically was much shorter – sometimes a few days or weeks.

“The Medal of Honor was intended to recognize heroism when it happens. If we had more heroes we could celebrate, it would put a different face on this Iraq war,” said Joseph Kinney of Pinehurst, N.C., a Vietnam War veteran who has written articles and lobbied Congress for a streamlined process.

Some veterans also complain that the Pentagon has failed to recognize any living veterans of the Iraq or Afghanistan wars with Medals of Honor. The three recipients from these conflicts – Navy Lt. Michael Murphy, Marine Cpl. Jason Dunham and Army Sgt. 1st Class Paul Smith – all died during the battles that led to their awards.

In World War II, 43 percent of Medal of Honor recipients survived their combat actions. The figure was 28 percent for the Korean War and 62 percent for the Vietnam War, said U.S. Rep. John McHugh, R-N.Y., a former chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel.

In December, the subcommittee held public hearings on the awarding of military medals. Kinney testified at length, suggesting that any posthumous valor award be granted within seven days of death, and that awards to any living service member be given within 30 days of his or her return from the war theater.

He also asked that more combat veterans serve on awards boards.

Little has changed since the hearings, Kinney said in a recent interview.

“The Pentagon has absolutely, once again, totally dropped the ball,” he said. “There's been no reform.”

Pentagon officials and some veterans point out that the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts differ markedly from past wars. For example, they said the earlier wars involved massive armies in sustained combat.

“You were in the jungle in Vietnam, but the battle was extremely close,” said Robert Modrzejewski, 73, of Tierrasanta, a retired Marine colonel who received a Medal of Honor in 1968. “In Iraq and Afghanistan, there's a lot of distance.”

Once a service member is nominated for a high-level valor award, the judging process starts with the troops who witnessed the act of bravery. Their eyewitness statements are gathered by the unit commander, along with other supporting evidence.

Those statements pass through review boards from the service member's brigade and division headquarters. A division commander can authorize awards no higher than a Bronze Star, the fourth-highest award for combat valor.

The top three tiers of awards – the Medal of Honor, the three service crosses and the Silver Star – require Pentagon review.

The evaluation process for every medal is supposed to be confidential. The identities of the board members and the number of people serving on each board are closely guarded.

Such measures are designed to keep out politics and lobbying, said Priest, the Navy's decorations and medals director.

“It's not that we're being secretive,” she said. “We're trying to preserve the integrity of the process.”

Priest said Secretary of the Navy Donald Winter appoints senior Navy and Marine Corps officers to serve on the department's highest-level awards board. They advise Winter, who makes the final decision on Navy Crosses.

“They are very experienced. Most have served in combat,” Priest said. “It's not just a bunch of paper-pushers.”

At the Pentagon level, evaluators are told to weigh the quality and accuracy of statements submitted on behalf of a nominee. They also analyze supplementary documents such as maps showing where the combat valor took place, post-battle reports, and autopsy and medical records.

“A big part is making sure there is harmony among the facts,” said Bill Carr, the Defense Department's deputy undersecretary for military personnel policy. “It's very, very exhaustive.”

Jay Vargas of San Diego, who received the Medal of Honor as a young Marine officer in 1968, said: “It has to be a tough process. There can't be any glitches whatsoever.”

After an awards board signs off on a Medal of Honor nomination, its recommendation must be approved by the defense secretary and ultimately the president.

“I think the system is good,” said Thomas Richards of Rancho Bernardo, a retired Marine lieutenant and the national commandant for the Legion of Valor. “I wouldn't tinker with the way the system works.”

It's unclear whether that system will result in a Medal of Honor for Peralta, a naturalized U.S. citizen who grew up in Tijuana and graduated from Morse High School. He lived in the Webster neighborhood of San Diego and is survived by his mother and three younger siblings.

His fellow Marines said they will keep alive the story of his courage.

Hours after Peralta's death, Cpl. Richard Mason, a member of his battalion, urged Marine combat journalist Travis Kaemmerer to forever remember him.

“You're still here; don't forget that,” Mason told Kaemmerer, an eyewitness who later wrote about the events. “Tell your kids, your grandkids, what Sgt. Peralta did for you and the other Marines today.”

Steve Liewer: (619) 498-6632; steve.liewer@uniontrib.com


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: heroes; moh; nocinmoh; peralta; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2007 5:52:44 PM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101; doug from upland
I first read his story posted on here, and again in the book, No Greater Glory: The Battle of Fallujah

If there is anyone who is deserving of the CMOH, it would be Sgt. Peralta.

2 posted on 11/11/2007 5:58:02 PM PST by Maigrey ("We still get our basic rights from God and not government." - Fred D Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey

Deserving, indeed. God rest this hero’s soul and give comfort to his family.


3 posted on 11/11/2007 6:00:12 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Due to the title of this article I smell a RAT.

No question this Marine deserves an MOH but why post it like this?

4 posted on 11/11/2007 6:00:57 PM PST by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Pentagon officials said a meticulous, lengthy process is essential to preserving the mystique that surrounds the Medal of Honor.

There were some awarded in World War II for political reasons. While almost all are highly deserved, the Pentagon spin doesn't hold water for those familiar with history.

5 posted on 11/11/2007 6:01:30 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
God bless Sgt. Rafael Peralta and his family. He most certainly has earned the MOH.

The lack of such awarded observations is simply wrong. Bureaucrats and the current politics within the process are to blame.

No mind, the men serving know the honor of these warriors.

6 posted on 11/11/2007 6:07:44 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

During the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, there were 34 medals of honor awarded to soldier and Marines who fought their way into Peking. That the Pentagon has been so stingy with the award during GWOT is disgraceful when there have been so many selfless acts of heroism by our troops in battle.


7 posted on 11/11/2007 6:08:39 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

“Hours after Peralta’s death, Cpl. Richard Mason, a member of his battalion, urged Marine combat journalist Travis Kaemmerer to forever remember him.”

“You’re still here; don’t forget that,” Mason told Kaemmerer, an eyewitness who later wrote about the events. “Tell your kids, your grandkids, what Sgt. Peralta did for you and the other Marines today.”

Eyewitness/soldier/marine accounts are the basis for awarding of medals..sounds like a hero to me, IMHO


8 posted on 11/11/2007 6:09:07 PM PST by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
“The Medal of Honor was intended to recognize heroism when it happens. If we had more heroes we could celebrate, it would put a different face on this Iraq war,” said Joseph Kinney of Pinehurst, N.C., a Vietnam War veteran who has written articles and lobbied Congress for a streamlined process.

I suspect the answer is right here in the article - the process is being sabotaged by Clinton-era holdovers who are using the powers they have to prevent the creation of too many "Bush War Heroes".

9 posted on 11/11/2007 6:14:16 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Perhaps the CIC could ask around a bit...


10 posted on 11/11/2007 6:17:50 PM PST by frankenMonkey (101st Army Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

I would say that you hit the nail squarely on the head.


11 posted on 11/11/2007 6:21:55 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

“During the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, there were 34 medals of honor awarded to soldier and Marines who fought their way into Peking.”

IIRC, the ONLY medal that the Army awarded between the Civil War and World War I was the Medal of Honor. It did not have the same cachet during those years that it did during the Civil War and afterwards, for that reason; it was simply an award for valor.

“That the Pentagon has been so stingy with the award during GWOT is disgraceful when there have been so many selfless acts of heroism by our troops in battle.”

With that part, though, I thoroughly agree...


12 posted on 11/11/2007 6:23:42 PM PST by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

“I suspect the answer is right here in the article - the process is being sabotaged by Clinton-era holdovers who are using the powers they have to prevent the creation of too many “Bush War Heroes”.”

Why not!? Leftist Bureaucrats are screwing up everything from Ag. to FBI to Foggy Bottom to Homeland to Intel, and the list goes on. You probably have hit the nail on the head in my opinion.


13 posted on 11/11/2007 6:25:00 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Is there a board that decides who is awarded the CMOH? Are they civilian or military?We all know the pentagon is rife with liberals.The Marine is deserving of the medal for sure.


14 posted on 11/11/2007 6:25:04 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
I suspect the answer is right here in the article - the process is being sabotaged by Clinton-era holdovers who are using the powers they have to prevent the creation of too many "Bush War Heroes".

DING DING DING!!! THE WINNAH!!!

15 posted on 11/11/2007 6:26:56 PM PST by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: radar101

2-3 years does sound overly excessive to me. Especially since many of the witnesses are in combat themselves and may not survive that long.


16 posted on 11/11/2007 6:31:42 PM PST by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
That the Pentagon has been so stingy with the award during GWOT is disgraceful

Disagreeing here, amigo....the MOH is so revered that it must go thru such a vetting process to maintain it's integrity.

Even Mitchell Paige (Guadalcanal, October 1942) wasn't awarded his until six months later - and his actions were witnessed by a multitude of Marines on the open battlefield (something we do NOT have in Iraq).

I have no bitch at all with holding this supreme honor to the utmost scrutiny.

17 posted on 11/11/2007 6:32:13 PM PST by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Thanks for posting this.


18 posted on 11/11/2007 7:15:57 PM PST by kathsua (A woman can do anything a man can do and have babies besides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
How about the story of "Red" Erwin, whose act of courage was so stunning that his Medal of Honor was authorized in a matter of hours.

Master Sergeant Henry E. "Red" Erwin

Medal of Honor recipient Henry E. Erwin passed away in January 2002 at age 80. But 57 years earlier, Erwin showed dramatically how willing he was to give up his life to save the crew of his B-29 Superfortress. His heroism resulted not only in saving his crew and earning him the ultimate military honor, but also put his story on the silver screen.

Erwin was born in May 1921 in Adamsville, Ala., near Bessemer. He entered the Army Air Corps as an enlisted man, becoming a radio operator. On April 12, 1945, Erwin, then a staff sergeant, was assigned to the 52nd Bombardment Squadron, 29th Bombardment Group, based in Guam. He was a radio operator on a B-29 called the City of Los Angeles, piloted by Capt George Simeral. They were in formation in a low-level attack on a chemical plant at Koriyama, 120 miles north of Tokyo, on their 11th combat mission.

Along with their primary jobs, the 12 B-29 crew members had additional duties to perform. Erwin's was to drop phosphorus smoke bombs through a chute in the B-29's floor when the lead plane reached an assembly area over enemy territory. He was given the signal to drop the bombs when the aircraft was just off the south coast of Japan and under attack by anti-aircraft fire and enemy fighters. In his shirtsleeves, Erwin, called "Red" by his crew members, pulled the pin and released a bomb into the chute. The fuse malfunctioned, igniting the phosphorus, burning at 1,100 degrees. The canister flew back up the chute and into Erwin's face, blinding him, searing off one ear and obliterating his nose. Smoke immediately filled the aircraft, making it impossible for the pilot to see his instrument panel.

Erwin was afraid the bomb would burn through the metal floor into the bomb bay. Completely blind, he picked it up and feeling his way, crawled around the gun turret and headed for the copilot's window. His face and arms were covered with ignited phosphorous and his path was blocked by the navigator's folding table, hinged to the wall but down and locked. The navigator had left his table to make a sighting. Erwin couldn't release the table's latches with one hand, so he grabbed the white-hot bomb between his bare right arm and his ribcage. In the few seconds it took to raise the table, the phosphorus burned through his flesh to the bone. His body on fire, he stumbled into the cockpit, threw the bomb out the window and collapsed between the pilot's seats.

The smoke cleared enough for Simeral to pull the B-29 out of a dive at 300 feet above the water and turn toward Iwo Jima where Erwin could be given emergency treatment. His horrified crew members extinguished his burning clothes and administered first aid, but whenever Erwin's burns were uncovered, phosphorus embedded in his skin would begin to smolder. Although in excruciating pain, Erwin remained conscious throughout the flight. He only spoke to inquire about the safety of the crew.

Back at Iwo Jima, the medics didn't believe he could survive. Army Air Force officials, led by Maj. Gen. Curtis LeMay and Brig. Gen. Lauris Norstad, approved award of the Medal of Honor in a matter of hours, so a presentation could be made while Erwin still lived. A medal was flown to Guam and presented in the hospital there.

However, Erwin managed to survive. He was flown back to the United States, and after 30 months and 41 surgeries, his eyesight was restored and he regained use of one arm. He was given a disability discharge as a master sergeant in October 1947. For 37 years, he served as a Veterans' Benefit Counselor at the Veterans' Hospital in Birmingham, Ala. He passed away peacefully at home on Jan. 16, 2002.

In 1951, Hollywood included his story as part of the movie, "The Wild Blue Yonder," starring Forrest Tucker, Wendell Corey and Vera Ralston. Erwin was played by David Sharpe.

In 1997, the Air Force created the Henry E. Erwin Outstanding Enlisted Aircrew Member of the Year Award. It is presented annually to an airman, noncommissioned officer and senior noncommissioned officer in the active-duty or reserve forces. It goes to members of the flight engineering, loadmaster, air surveillance and related career fields. It is only the second Air Force award named for an enlisted person.

Sources compiled from Air Force News Agency and U.S. Air Force Museum.

As an interesting aside, his son, Henry E. Erwin Jr., is a Republican state senator in Alabama.

19 posted on 11/11/2007 7:17:28 PM PST by Stonewall Jackson (The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: radar101

What a brave man..Thanks for this great post

It’s disgusting and dishonorable that this US Marine has not been awarded the Medal of Honor...


20 posted on 11/11/2007 7:22:38 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson