Skip to comments.
Is a Vote for Rudy a Vote for War?
yahoo.com ^
| 11/09/2007
| Patrick Buchanan
Posted on 11/11/2007 1:21:35 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
James Madison also brought the USA to war with Great Britain, because pacifism only works in theory, not in practice.
To: Tailgunner Joe
We will fight a war if need be. Any candidate that says that he/she will not go to war under any circumstances is NOT a viable candidate. IMHO.
2
posted on
11/11/2007 1:24:43 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: Tailgunner Joe
War?
NO.
But it would be a vote for abortion
gun control
high taxes
support for the homosexual agenda
support and amnesty for illegals.
welfare for illegals.
But hey, who’s counting.
3
posted on
11/11/2007 1:25:49 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: fhayek
Hey Pat B... Make love, not war...give peace a chance...
4
posted on
11/11/2007 1:27:38 PM PST
by
tips up
To: Tailgunner Joe
And, as James Madison said, wars are the death of republics.Ours seems to have survived quite a few, including the 40+ year Cold War. Our republic is still intact, if more than a little tattered.
To: Tailgunner Joe
Pat’s position is “What’s best for muzzies who want to blow up Americans?”
6
posted on
11/11/2007 1:31:20 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Pat Buchanan's arguments are almost enough to get me to support Rudy!!
On second thought, NAHH!
7
posted on
11/11/2007 1:33:41 PM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(Ron Paul Criminality: http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2007/10/paul_bot)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Not surprising. Typical fare from Pat “SS” Buchanan.
8
posted on
11/11/2007 1:38:05 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(Elections have consequences.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Any conservative who would trust the liberal Giuliani handling any issue, needs to have their head examined, posthaste.
9
posted on
11/11/2007 1:38:59 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Rudy is dead on when it comes to foreign policy.
It’s his disgusting support of abortion that makes him unacceptable as the Republican nominee.
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Rudy over Hillary, case closed.
11
posted on
11/11/2007 1:56:00 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: Perdogg
Your smear is not surprising either. Typical fare from those who want to keep the US in endless Middle East wars.
To: canuck_conservative
"...Typical fare from those who want to keep the US in endless Middle East wars..." Ah yesback to the good old days of the Clinton Administration.
13
posted on
11/11/2007 2:42:06 PM PST
by
Does so
(...against all enemies, DOMESTIC and foreign...)
To: Tailgunner Joe

Rudy is a draft-dodging, cross-dressing poof!
14
posted on
11/11/2007 2:46:04 PM PST
by
tear gas
(Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
To: tear gas
Rudy is a draft-dodging
The only one not a draft dodger is Duncan Hunter!!!
To: napscoordinator
John McCain served. I can't say that any of the others were actually draft-DODGERS, but I know that Rudy did that.
I had heard that Rudy had told them he was a cross-dresser to get out of the service, but then I read this info on how he dodged the draft:
http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/30661/
16
posted on
11/11/2007 2:54:25 PM PST
by
tear gas
(Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
To: Tailgunner Joe
It is a vote for fighting the war as it is being fought now, at least until Congress takes it all away from him. He will have a congress more Democrat than the current one and I don’t see him taking out Iran before he has a “real reason” to i.e. we lose a city or two to Iranian nukes. And he will have that problem facing him because Bush most likely is putting off doing the necessary until at least the next administration.
17
posted on
11/11/2007 3:02:16 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
To: fhayek
Rudy will do more damage to the Republican Party
and the pro-life cause than Hillary can. He cannot get good judges past the Congress he will face, even if he appoints them in the first place. 2 years later he will get an even lefter Congress. And his idea of "strict construction" or "original intent" is a bit different from mine. His constitution doesn't contain a 2nd Amendment and it does contain abortion. Mrs. Bill will at least cause us to get a Republican House after 2 years.
If we get any of the current front runners- a Democrat or Giuliani or Romney, just accept that the next 3 USSC appointments are going to be somewhere between Souter on the Right and Breyer on the Left. If a Democrat makes those appointments, especially if it is Mrs. Clinton then they will be 30 year old Left Activists.
18
posted on
11/11/2007 3:10:42 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
To: arthurus
19
posted on
11/11/2007 3:22:11 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: Tailgunner Joe
But it will be the end of the republican party.Conservatives will not stand for this nonsense.
20
posted on
11/11/2007 4:25:30 PM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson