Check out the pre-existing discussion at:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1923614/posts?page=132#132
Jeff Head (one of Free Republic’s resident experts on Naval issues) has opined (and I agree) that the Chinese sub was forced to surface. (Be sure to read his post)
It makes more sense than just surfacing in the middle of the battle group to make a point. Any sub drivers out there have an opinion of whether or not a sub is going to surface in the company of “enemy” ships without being forced to do so?
I was always under the impression that was anathema to any submariner of ANY country, but not having served on boats, I don’t know. Any thoughts?
However, it is said that if you really, really want to rattle a surface group commander's chain... You let them detect you, get a solid hit, then disappear. That way they know death is on their doorstep, and there is nothing they can do about it. It is rumored that under direct orders from someone at the admiral level that card may have been played once or twice.
One guess on the chinese sub's surfacing... They played the game well and managed to get inside the screen. However, it took so long and/or relied on favorable currents/drifting etc. that they had no battery left for a mock attack or evasion/extraction and were forced to surface to recharge and/or exchange air. Or maybe the screen commander decided to prosecute the contact and they were forced to surface. That could be from an active sonar lashing, mock depth charges (Soviets used to do that to us)...Or maybe the sound of a 688 opening the outer doors of its torpedo tubes about 3000 yds astern... ;-)
That's debatable.
I recommend his books too, Dragon’s Fury.