Posted on 11/10/2007 6:44:17 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
N. Korea's cooperation may undercut US intelligence: Washington Post
Sat Nov 10, 3:27 AM ET
The government of North Korea is providing information that could prove that, contrary to US claims, the communist country never intended to produce highly-enriched uranium for nuclear weapons, The Washington Post reported on its website Friday.
Citing unnamed US and South Korean officials, the newspaper said the evidence is undermining a key US intelligence finding made five years ago and used in public statements by President George W. Bush.
The North Korean government has granted US experts access to equipment and documents to make its case, in preparation for declaring the extent of its nuclear activities before the end of the year, the report said.
North Korean officials hope the United States will simultaneously lift sanctions against Pyongyang when the declaration is made, according to the paper.
If North Korea successfully demonstrates that US accusations about the uranium-enrichment program are wrong, it will be a blow to US intelligence and the Bush administration's credibility, The Post said.
The US intelligence community's credibility has already been undercut by claims that Iraq was secretly stockpiling weapons of mass destruction, a charge proved to be wrong following the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.
The US charges of a large-scale uranium program in North Korea led to the collapse of a 1994 agreement that had frozen a North Korean reactor that produced a different nuclear substance -- plutonium, the report said.
The move freed North Korea to use the plutonium route toward gathering the material needed for a nuclear weapon.
Pyongyang conducted its first nuclear test last year, detonating a plutonium-based device.
"This is now in the process of being clarified," The Post quotes a senior South Korean official as saying. "The North Koreans are now ready to prove that they did not intend to make a uranium-enrichment program by importing some materials."
US intelligence first concluded in July 2002 that North Korea had embarked on a large-scale program to produce highly enriched uranium for use in weapons, the paper noted.
"We discovered that, contrary to an agreement they had with the United States, they're enriching uranium, with a desire of developing a weapon," President Bush said in a November 2002 news conference.
After the administration accused Pyongyang of violating the 1994 agreement struck to freeze its plutonium facilities, North Korea ejected UN inspectors from the country and restarted its plutonium reactor, The Post recalled.
Is it good enough for dropping charges against him? Maybe the prosecutor in charge is too liberal. The rumor says that the prosecutor is a tall slender middle-aged woman with a Ph. D degree, whose assistant goes by the nickname Kim Jong-Hill.
Ping!
I've read the output of APF for a long time. They would put out such an article. But why would the Washington Post carry such an article? I mean, we all know that the Post is biased. But when did they get bone stupid?
Congressman Billybob
Even if you didn’t know that NK has already exploded a nuke, you can’t get past sentence #1 if you have the merest knowledge of epistemology, namely, first that it’s impossible to prove a negative, doubly so to prove someone’s intentions (which requires mind reading) and triply so to prove the same negative for each and every member of NK’s government. If so much as one person in NK’s government “intended” to produce highly enriched uranium, this whole article is less than worthless. And, it’s from the Washington Compost (but I repeat myself).
Oh, well, if it was just plutonium I guess we shouldn’t have worried.
What the administration knew in 2002 -- and what remains uncontested now -- is that North Korea secretly obtained 20 centrifuges for uranium enrichment from Pakistan and purchased other equipment needed to construct a large-scale enrichment facility. When U.S. officials confronted the North Koreans at a bilateral negotiation session, members of a U.S. diplomatic team received what they believed was a defiant confirmation. That tipped an internal administration debate toward hard-liners who all along had wanted to renounce the Clinton administration's "agreed framework" with Pyongyang.
(Another Intelligence Twist, March 2, 2007)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.