Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff

The problem with your “scientific poll” charts is that they include such clunkers as American Research Group (ARG) and Quinnipiac. Take those two biased surveys out and the results are astoundingly different, aren’t they?


21 posted on 11/09/2007 9:27:32 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
The problem with your “scientific poll” charts is that they include such clunkers as American Research Group (ARG) and Quinnipiac. Take those two biased surveys out and the results are astoundingly different, aren’t they?

The charts that you are looking at on this thread are for Rasmussen only and are labeled as such. The other charts I post and which are on my profile page incorporate all poll results and use a 4-period moving average to round off the "clunkers". I use the same exact method that RealClearPolitics uses and it is a valid method. If you don't like the results of certain polls, don't look at them. If you don't like my charts, don't look at them either.

27 posted on 11/09/2007 9:33:52 AM PST by Spiff (<------ Click here for updated polling results. Go Mitt! www.mittromney.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson