To: 2ndDivisionVet
The problem with your “scientific poll” charts is that they include such clunkers as American Research Group (ARG) and Quinnipiac. Take those two biased surveys out and the results are astoundingly different, aren’t they? The charts that you are looking at on this thread are for Rasmussen only and are labeled as such. The other charts I post and which are on my profile page incorporate all poll results and use a 4-period moving average to round off the "clunkers". I use the same exact method that RealClearPolitics uses and it is a valid method. If you don't like the results of certain polls, don't look at them. If you don't like my charts, don't look at them either.
27 posted on
11/09/2007 9:33:52 AM PST by
Spiff
(<------ Click here for updated polling results. Go Mitt! www.mittromney.com)
To: Spiff
Might want to see a dermatologist about that thin skin problem...
29 posted on
11/09/2007 9:35:12 AM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: Spiff
32 posted on
11/09/2007 9:36:26 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Spiff
If you don't like my charts, don't look at them either.Seeing how this is a political discussion forum, I think we'll all reserve the right to look at whatever is posted and discuss it.
33 posted on
11/09/2007 9:37:11 AM PST by
Petronski
("Willard, you can’t buy South Carolina. You can’t even rent it.”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson