Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arderkrag

Would you rather live in a country that routinely tortures people or live in a country that does not, but will have a major city vaporized by a terrorist nuclear weapon within the next ten years?

I would choose the latter, and I suspect you would too.

That said, what we are being offered is life in a country that routinely tortures people that will probably have a major city vaporized by a terrorist nuclear weapon within the next ten years anyway. Torture will do nothing to stop that, and may even make it more likely.


28 posted on 11/09/2007 6:40:48 AM PST by gridlock (Recycling is the new Religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock

Tortue will never, and could never, do anything to stop it. Your question is invalid. I would choose neither.


29 posted on 11/09/2007 6:42:07 AM PST by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: gridlock

It has been stated over and over again.

We do not use this technique routinely.


55 posted on 11/09/2007 6:57:12 AM PST by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: gridlock
Would you rather live in a country that routinely tortures people or live in a country that does not, but will have a major city vaporized by a terrorist nuclear weapon within the next ten years? I would choose the latter, and I suspect you would too

I would prefer the former. You fail to mention that democracy utterly collapses when all semblance of security is taken away - which would of course would happen in the case of losing a major US city.

You also fail to mention that the people we "routinely torture" willingly and gleefully ignore any and all treaties covering the conduct of warfare, and view civilians as the best targets. Why do you insist there are no consequences to that? Why are these filthy animals given Geneva-abiding human rights?

I will make a final comparison:

They saw the heads off of living, breathing, US CIVILIANS, on camera.

WE severely scare them, with water.

I can't grasp where we are doing something immoral.

176 posted on 11/09/2007 8:03:30 AM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: gridlock
Would you rather live in a country that routinely tortures people or live in a country that does not, but will have a major city vaporized by a terrorist nuclear weapon within the next ten years?

Absolutely false dichotomy.

I would rather live in a country that has strong general respect for human rights, but which is prepared, when justified, to do whatever it takes to stop an enemy who is absolutely brutal, inhuman, demonic, barbarian and immoral, who would not hesitate for one single second to gang-rape your wife and slit your childrens' throats right before your eyes if they thought it would bring them an inch of gain; so that we that we have the best chance possible of avoiding seeing the city your mother lives in torn to little tiny bits of concrete and flaming wood by a nuclear bomb, with radiation spilling across the country and sickening millions of American children, so that they live the rest of their lives in pain and suffering.

That's the kind of country I would prefer to live in.

196 posted on 11/09/2007 8:17:23 AM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson