Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Abortion Law Firm: 30 States Would Likely Ban Abortion if Roe Reversed
Life News ^ | 11/8/07 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 11/08/2007 3:06:38 PM PST by wagglebee

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A leading pro-abortion law firm has released a new report saying thirty states are likely to ban most or all abortions if the Supreme Court reverses the Roe v. Wade decision. The firm also conducted a poll finding many Americans are unaware of pro-life efforts to get abortion bans in place for when the high court overturns the case.

The New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights says Roe is under attack like never before with pro-life activists using new strategies at both the state and federal level.

It's most recent version of its report "What if Roe Fell?" finds that pro-life groups are advocating both immediate bans on abortion as well as trigger laws that would make abortions illegal if Roe is reversed.

"Across the country, a dangerous, but largely undetected movement is laying the foundation for a post-Roe world in which abortion would once again be a crime," Nancy Northup, president of the Center, said in a statement LifeNews.com received.

The center says seventeen states have introduced 38 abortion bans or trigger laws in the last three years.

Four states, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota and South Dakota have introduced abortion bans and South Dakota's legislature was the only one to approve it (though voters there narrowly rejected the measure afterwards).

The pro-abortion law firm also reported that more than two dozen states would likely ban abortion or have trigger laws immediately going into effect after a potential Supreme Court decision overturning the major abortion case.

It lists 21 states as most likely to ban abortions in that instance: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

It classifies another 9 states as somewhat likely: Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania.

Meanwhile, the abortion advocacy group hired Lake Research Partners to do a survey about Roe issues.

According to the polling data, 63 percent of Americans believe that Roe v. Wade is increasingly vulnerable under the current Supreme Court.

Another 60 percent are largely unaware of legislative efforts underway at the state level to ban abortion or put trigger laws in place. And about 58 percent of those polled are not aware of the current laws on abortion in their home state.

The survey reached 1,000 registered voters nationwide and it had a 2.7 percent margin of error.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; roevwade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: wagglebee
Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm


41 posted on 11/09/2007 4:03:41 AM PST by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

You’ll probably see AK, TN, WY come on that list. But not WV because it is normally a KKK Byrdbrain state. FL is about lefty as it can get in most places because of the eastern liberals who have moved down there for the sun. They hate the south, but do not consider FL the south, rather northern communist Cuba. Where naturally they are at home with socialism.


42 posted on 11/09/2007 5:52:19 AM PST by RetiredArmy (The Marxist's Dimocrat Party led us to defeat in Vietnam and want to repeat it in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Were this to happen, I can see Katie Couric now interviewing a “poor” person who has to travel to another state at considerable expense to procure her “needed” abortion. Katie will then tell the sheeple how “unfair” that is.


43 posted on 11/09/2007 6:24:47 AM PST by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
I am sure that law would stand for a day or two before it was struck down by a court.

Actually, didn't we see the counter-example to that in Massachusetts "gay marriages" (thanks, Mitt! </sarc>) -- at least one of the couple had to be a MA resident.

44 posted on 11/09/2007 6:30:22 AM PST by kevkrom (“Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?” - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

actually the LEGAL arugumnt goes like, “so reversing Roe vs. Wade would NOT make abortion illegal. Reversal of that opinion would ONLY put it back on individual states to decide.”

Kind of kills their legal boogey man.

How many states do or do not do a particular act is irrelevant.

simple, clean and elegant.


45 posted on 11/09/2007 6:36:58 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“A thirty state ban would only help the Greyhound Bus Company.”

NO, I don’t think it would. It might be a great start that could pick up steam over a period of years as the CCW has done.


46 posted on 11/09/2007 12:05:04 PM PST by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

I, too, will fight for Duncan Hunter. He has the strongest commitment of all the presidential candidates for the life issue.

Hunter and Brownback were the only ones to attend the pro-life march in D.C., and Brownback has dropped out.

Hunter will be on Glenn Beck’s show tonight, and I hope that gives him a boost.


47 posted on 11/09/2007 3:33:20 PM PST by Sun (Duncan Hunter: pro-God/life/borders, understands Red China threat, NRA A+rating! www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson