Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maryland Democrats Want to Take "Abandoned" Gift Certificates for Revenue
Maryland Legislature Website ^ | 11/08/07 | Reaganesque

Posted on 11/08/2007 5:52:42 AM PST by Reaganesque

I was listening to the radio this morning when I heard of a bill that has been proposed in the Maryland Legislature. House Bill 30 states:

From the summary:

"Establishing the Maryland Education Fund; providing that after a specified date, the balance remaining on a gift certificate shall be presumed abandoned; requiring a person that sells or issues a gift certificate in the State to remit to the Comptroller the remaining balance on gift certificates on or before a specified date each year; etc."

From the bill itself:

(C) (1) THE BALANCE REMAINING ON A GIFT CERTIFICATE SHALL BE PRESUMED TO BE ABANDONED ON THE LATER OF:

(I) THE DATE THAT IS 4 YEARS AFTER THE DATE THE GIFT CERTIFICATE IS PURCHASED; OR

(II) THE DATE THAT IS 1 YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF THE LAST PURCHASE MADE USING THE GIFT CERTIFICATE.

(2) ON OR BEFORE MARCH 1 OF EACH YEAR, A PERSON THAT SELLS OR ISSUES GIFT CERTIFICATES IN THE STATE SHALL REMIT TO THE COMPTROLLER THE BALANCE REMAINING ON EACH GIFT CERTIFICATE THAT WAS PRESUMED ABANDONED DURING THE PREVIOUS YEAR.

(3) ON OR BEFORE APRIL 1 OF EACH YEAR, THE COMPTROLLER SHALL DISTRIBUTE THE REVENUES RECEIVED UNDER PARAGRAPH

(2) OF THIS SUBSECTION TO THE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND ESTABLISHED UNDER § 5–201.1 OF THE EDUCATION ARTICLE.

(Click on "House Bill 30" title at the top of the summary page for the full PDF copy of the bill.)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: abandonded; certificates; greed; legislature; md
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Reaganesque

Uh, doesn’t the revenue belong to the seller? This is outright Marxism.


41 posted on 11/08/2007 7:24:58 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

Thanks for that explanation.

I will pose a hypothetical to you for your take on it?

What if I but a $25 cert. from Mom and Pop store that is non-refundable. Mom and Pop store sells nothing but gizmo X which is sold for $25. Mom and Pop make these gizmos for $1 each plus a lot of time and effort - the rest is their profit. I never use the cert. that I purchased. Can Mom and Pop just send the gizmo I would have had to purchase to the gov.?


42 posted on 11/08/2007 7:32:50 AM PST by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

bump


43 posted on 11/08/2007 7:34:33 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

This is not new.

Please read the article at Review Journal. http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2007/Mar-29-Thu-2007/news/13459608.html

This is a load of horse feathers, but many states are getting in on it.


44 posted on 11/08/2007 7:47:53 AM PST by jdietz ("There's small Revenge in Words, but Words may be greatly revenged" Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Who said that the Progressive Liberals aren’t Orwellian?
Sounds like Big Brother is here, thanks to the Dem’s.


45 posted on 11/08/2007 8:19:11 AM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
He has to give it BACK TO THE STATE!

It is not BACK to the state because they never were the state's in the first place. That is the point here. Ownership of anything should never 'revert to the state'. Complete and utter garbage and a slippery slope down to where everything is owned by the state and we only use it at their sufferance.
46 posted on 11/08/2007 8:21:46 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Now don’t get smart, Maryland is known as The Free State for a reason, your money is free to tax.


47 posted on 11/08/2007 8:30:41 AM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
Thank you for the explanation of the accounting for these kinds of transactions. I concur with your interpretation.

From what you say, existing laws should cover this situation. If so, then I wonder why do the legislators think the need this new law. Any ideas?

48 posted on 11/08/2007 8:36:03 AM PST by foxfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Regrets.

I know you don’t like it that I knew something you didn’t and wrote a bang up post about it. Jealousy is an ugly thing.

Nobody dislikes the government as much as I. But I’ve nicely explained the logic and when you pick your battles is this one you really want to fight?

The state does NOT get to keep the money unless no one claims it. The state DOES try to contact the proper owners, I’m sure you’ve seen those ads in the newspapers. Are you so naive as to believe the wonderful, kind-hearted businesses would be jumping through hoops to return the money? Do you really think that BankofAmerica is more deserving of what has to be many millions of dollars of unclaimed funds?

Hey, I don’t think so. I’m not convinced that the government should get to keep it either, I’ll be honest. But again...the government DOES try to find the proper owner and almost 75% of the money is claimed by the rightful owner.

You might suggest legislation that unclaimed funds go to a reputable charity or some such but to make a comment like “ownership not reverting to the state” without offering a solution simply shows lack of thought.

If NOTHING is done with the unclaimed funds...as you seem to be proposing, then the businesses get to keep them. I’m not convinced this is better and I’ve made my case. You don’t have to accept my case but I don’t have to discuss anything with a closed mind.

We shall agree to disagree....

...moving on.


49 posted on 11/08/2007 8:40:30 AM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Yep. This is like the magician’s assistant in the low-cut dress and fishnets stepping onto the stage at the moment the magician does his prestidigitation.


50 posted on 11/08/2007 8:42:44 AM PST by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: foxfield

Well like I said....I’m thinking that gift cards were never considered “unclaimed property”. I did do those unclaimed property reports for both Delaware and Merryland. I did some for Caleefourkneeya as well.

But the businesses I worked for never had gift cards. I worked at a hospital and we had plenty of unclaimed property. Patients often left their personal effects at the hospital. Do you think the hospital should be allowed to keep them? Sure most times we weren’t talking big bucks but at times someone left a pocketbook, jewelry, a wallet. The hospital most times found the patient to return it but hey, we had to sell it to a wholesale guy and give the proceeds to the state.

Point being it’s a much more complicated thing than this oversimplification headline would allow. Freepers, with the exception of a few, are mostly intelligent people and will read and benefit from the experiences of other Freepers. We are, after all, the people who carry this country on our back whilst raising the children and soldiers of tomorrow. We’ve got common sense out here in la-la land and give me any topic and somewhere in the Freerepublic membership rolls, someone will have experience in the matter.

Yon average American public wouldn’t read my long explanation. I’m not sure I blame them.

I did work for an accounting firm that serviced businesses with gift cards and I remember it being a big damn deal because hey, if Chili’s restaurant has hundreds of thousands of dollars of gift cards out there, that’s one hell of a liability. If a customer comes in and presents a gift card, the restaurant has to serve them food for God’s sake! This is not something a good accountant should overlook. A company on the stock market would probably have to show these liabilities....to not would be to mislead and break the law. Think of Sears...Wal-Mart...I bet they’ve got MILLIONS out there in gift card liabilities.

I do know that the unclaimed property report in Merryland does NOT list unclaimed gift cards (remember, the gift cards have to EXPIRE before they are removed from the books and become an unclaimed property). Those forms try to list the stuff that is considered unclaimed property and my memory is that gift cards aren’t on it. I could be wrong. Don’t hold me to this.

So I’m guessing this is just a way of getting this specifically listed on the form and maybe to make sure all the Merryland businesses understand that they don’t get to keep the money.

One more thing as I’ve bored y’all enough....understand here that these businesses have great flexibility in how they handle this unclaimed property. The hospital could once a year have a flea market, sell the stuff they have unclaimed from patients. They could then donate this to charity. This is perfectly acceptable. The state of Merryland is a steaming liberal hell but trust me, even Merryland doesn’t want to be dealing with all of this crap.

Most businesses do just that kind of thing. My mobile park buddy will fix up the trailer and re-rent it. He might give the new tenants free rent for a couple of months to attract someone and hey, he then can collect rent and write off the three month free rent as a business expense. He rarely sends money into the state but what he does to avoid just that is something that benefits the public in some fashion if only just furthering free enterprise.

Believe me, a business is generally run by smart, happening people. Such as myself as a matter of fact. They figure out a way to keep from giving that money back to the state.

And they do it well.


51 posted on 11/08/2007 8:56:30 AM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: craig_eddy
Ok. The company sells $20 for $25. The consumer pays $25 for $20 and the government wants to triple tax us both for the privilege? Have I got it now?
52 posted on 11/08/2007 9:22:07 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider

As soon as the housing market recovers, brother...


53 posted on 11/08/2007 9:24:19 AM PST by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MarkT; Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper

To say nothing about registering new voters.

cf: voter registration drive in Greenmount Cemetary.


54 posted on 11/08/2007 9:26:05 AM PST by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
As it is right now, after a period of time, if you don’t use it, fees start to be deducted monthly. Someone gets the money. I guess they figure, “why not us?”

Except that practice is illegal in a few states, including Connecticut.

55 posted on 11/08/2007 9:30:40 AM PST by CT-Freeper (Said the frequently disappointed but ever optimistic Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

“Such a law would violate the United States Constitution.”

So, what’s yer point?


56 posted on 11/08/2007 9:40:42 AM PST by incredulous joe ("I promise if you don't stop that right now I'm going to threaten you again!" - Kofi Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Sounds about right. :)


57 posted on 11/08/2007 9:42:55 AM PST by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

A blog post on the issue: http://www.business-opportunities.biz/2007/11/08/gift-certificate-rules-burn-small-biz/


58 posted on 11/08/2007 9:44:04 AM PST by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“Uh, doesn’t the revenue belong to the seller? This is outright Marxism.”

Yeah, don’t any of the seller’s want to put up a fight for the dough. They could set up a fund for breast cancer or something and run the revenue right into such an account.

At the end of the year they could publicize the contribution and everybody wins; the clerk wouldn’t have to bother asking if I’d like to contribute when I buy my milk, money goes to good cause, good pub for retailer, happy feelings and smiles abound.

This bill is pernicious by definition.


59 posted on 11/08/2007 9:46:44 AM PST by incredulous joe ("I promise if you don't stop that right now I'm going to threaten you again!" - Kofi Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Sooner or later Maryland will pass a law that allows the state to confiscate all of the loose change and pennies on my bedroom dresser and in the coin bin in my car. Not to mention the loose change that falls under the driver seat!
I’m sure the DemonRATS are already thinking about it.


60 posted on 11/08/2007 9:57:13 AM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson