Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: N3WBI3
Maybe for you but I cant vote for someone who thinks the 14th amendment does not cover the unborn..

I don't have any idea what Fred Thompson thinks on this matter, but I do know that no American appellate court, at either the State or Federal level, has ever so ruled.

And I am sure that the framers of the 14th never had the slightest intention that its provisions would cover a fetus. You may be loking for exactly the same kind of judicial activisim we find so objectionable when we find it in Democrats.

That's why I like to call people like you Democrats who just don't know it yet. You certainly are not conservatives.

262 posted on 11/08/2007 12:06:28 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine
And I am sure that the framers of the 14th never had the slightest intention that its provisions would cover a fetus.

oh bull doody, the framers of the 14th would have implicitly considered an unborn human to be just that *human*..

266 posted on 11/08/2007 12:24:20 PM PST by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson