To: DoughtyOne
Think country and party.
Thompson for eight years.
THEN his VP, Hunter, for another eight.
What could possibly be better than that?
9 posted on
11/07/2007 3:51:35 AM PST by
Flintlock
To: Flintlock
That was my take as well until someone told me Hunter’s age. I’m not sure he would run in eight years. BTW, I don’t remember it at the moment or I’d mention it. He’s older than I had originally thought.
19 posted on
11/07/2007 4:08:26 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Mrs Crinton have Pay Feava. There she go now. "Ah Hsu Ahhh Hsu Ah Hsu!" Crintons worth every penny.)
To: Flintlock; DoughtyOne
"Think country and party.
Thompson for eight years.
THEN his VP, Hunter, for another eight.
What could possibly be better than that?"
Bingo! Spending four or eight years as Veep may well be the best way for Hunter (who I do believe to be the better man) to increase his viability as a candidate.
That said, it certainly can't hurt to do as DoughtyOne suggests, and try to create "a buzz" -- for both candidates.
29 posted on
11/07/2007 4:28:22 AM PST by
LIConFem
(Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
To: Flintlock
Think country and party.Think country, the he** with party.
76 posted on
11/07/2007 6:12:17 AM PST by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson