Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Consumers feeling the helium squeeze
Chicago Tribune ^ | November 5, 2007 | Bob Secter

Posted on 11/07/2007 1:08:05 AM PST by a_chronic_whiner

Helium is the talk of the party balloon industry these days, and it is not a discussion being carried out in high-pitched giggles.

The second most plentiful element in the universe is suddenly in short supply on this planet, and that means soaring prices for a lot of things, balloons included.

"Some customers have told me they're just not going to sell balloons anymore because they can't get helium," said Chicago party wholesaler Lee Kaufman. "Everybody's scrambling."

As raw materials crises go, the helium shortage clearly takes a back seat to the global oil crunch. But the repercussions go well beyond the cost of decorating for birthdays or bar mitzvahs, while also shining a light on an obscure federal helium program that has proved critical to feeding the world's growing appetite.

To most of us, helium is just a novelty gas that floats blimps, bobs huge latex whales over car dealers and when inhaled makes your voice sound like Daffy Duck's. (That, by the way, is a really bad idea that could lead to a collapsed lung, experts say.)

But demand for the gas has taken off in industry and scientific research in recent years, and the helium squeeze is being felt everywhere from university physics labs to plants in India, China, Taiwan and Korea that make today's hottest consumer products. Japanese helium suppliers recently warned customers in the electronics industry to prepare for supply cuts of up to 30 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: chemistry; consumer; helium

1 posted on 11/07/2007 1:08:06 AM PST by a_chronic_whiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner
A related article

from the wired article: Cliffside will likely be empty in 10 to 25 years, and the Earth will be virtually helium-free by the end of the 21st century.

"For the scientific community, that's a tragedy," says Dave Cornelius, a Department of Interior chemist at Cliffside. "It would be a shame to squander it," agrees Kulcinski.


A bleak situation indeed.
2 posted on 11/07/2007 1:45:12 AM PST by a_chronic_whiner (The Stupid Shall be Punished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

It appears the sky isn’t falling, but the balloons are.


3 posted on 11/07/2007 2:15:08 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

No blood for helium!!


4 posted on 11/07/2007 4:47:01 AM PST by Clintons Are White Trash (Lynn Stewart, Helen Thomas , Maureen Dowd - The Axis of Ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

The German’s used hydrogen in their dirigibles (zeppelins) because we weren’t selling helium to them. Thus the Hindenberg.


5 posted on 11/07/2007 4:49:50 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

The government had a 10-year-supply of the stuff, and a mandate to dump it on the market.

So it’s no wonder that “private suppliers” have been slow to come online. How would they compete for the market against a seller that didn’t have to make money and was required to hold market share by law?

Of course, now that there is a shortage, they WISH they had figured out the future for the market and started finding new supplies, but that’s a lot of risk to take before the market exists.

Can we manufacture helium? Are we creating it in our muclear reactors?


6 posted on 11/07/2007 7:35:55 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

We’ve gone “muclear”, oh my!!!


7 posted on 11/07/2007 7:38:50 AM PST by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner
The market will prevail. When it costs $20 for a helium balloon for a child who can't hang on to it, then helium will be priced out of the consumer market, and will then go to industrial uses only.

Is there really enough volume in an average balloon to be a fire hazard if hydrogen were used instead? How many balloons come in range of open flame, anyway?

8 posted on 11/07/2007 7:48:31 AM PST by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112
Is there really enough volume in an average balloon to be a fire hazard if hydrogen were used instead?

A test tube of hydrogen, exposed to a spark, will burn instantly with a loud "whumph." Trust me, fire codes and commercial insurance policies will never allow the manufacture or sale of hydrogen ballons for entertainment purposes.

9 posted on 11/07/2007 7:56:40 AM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner

Thanks, I wasn’t sure about that. I guess the party balloon is a thing of the past, unless someone comes up with a way to dampen hydrogen’s burnability safely, cheaply, and effectively.


10 posted on 11/07/2007 7:58:56 AM PST by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

“Is there really enough volume in an average balloon to be a fire hazard if hydrogen were used instead? How many balloons come in range of open flame, anyway?

They are fun to shoot at with bottle rockets!


11 posted on 11/07/2007 7:59:43 AM PST by Unassuaged (I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

To be fair, there are 8 helium-producing fields in the world and none in Texas itself; Alaska, Kansas, Corolado, Utah are available to the U.S., I believe.

Recycling plants are springing up all over and one major operation is in Kansas.

It is assumed to be finite because it comes from those fields where fossil fuels are gleaned and we all know that we’re about to deplete all those sources soon.

No fossil-fuel methane and no helium.


12 posted on 11/07/2007 8:21:15 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner
Helium makes up about 0.0005% of the earth's atmosphere. This trace amount of helium is not gravitationally bound to the earth and is constantly lost to space.

Two years of science in high school and four more in college and this little fact was either not mentioned or escaped me. Perhaps the uses of helium then was exclusively trivial and the supply was of no concern.
Maybe it's time for that to change.

"It is used as an inert shield for arc welding, to pressurize the fuel tanks of liquid fueled rockets and in supersonic windtunnels. Helium is combined with oxygen to create a nitrogen free atmosphere for deep sea divers so that they will not suffer from a condition known as nitrogen narcosis. Liquid helium is an important cryogenic material and is used to study superconductivity and to create superconductive magnets. The Department of Energy's Jefferson Lab uses large amounts of liquid helium to operate its superconductive electron accelerator."

13 posted on 11/07/2007 10:14:34 AM PST by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner
As raw materials crises go, the helium shortage clearly takes a back seat to the global oil crunch.

And most of it comes up with oil, especially in the U.S..
14 posted on 11/07/2007 10:17:53 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
It is used as an inert shield for arc welding

Maybe in the defense industry or NASA. The rest of us use argon.

15 posted on 11/07/2007 10:21:06 AM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

We don’t seem to have any trouble getting helium around here. Used for helium leak testing of super secret military systems.


16 posted on 11/07/2007 10:29:44 AM PST by subterfuge (HILLARY IS: She who must not be Dismayed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

I see. You can simply refine more from the natural gas if needed. I have a question, what happens to the helium from other natural gas fields? is it put back for later extraction or simply lost to the refining process? what happens to the helium in natural gas is my question.


17 posted on 11/07/2007 1:14:36 PM PST by a_chronic_whiner (The Stupid Shall be Punished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

It’s lost when the gas is allowed to escape unless the proper equipment is used to separate and store it.


18 posted on 11/07/2007 1:18:21 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

No, we don’t manufacture helium (aside from hydrogen bombs). It is a noble gas, so it doesn’t chemically combine with other elements. If I remember correctly, helium is found in underground deposits. Of course, astronomical helium is found almost everywhere (40% of the universe or so).


19 posted on 11/12/2007 7:37:21 PM PST by MikeD (We live in a world where babies are like velveteen rabbits that only become real if they are loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson