Skip to comments.
CBN News: Romney Scores Major Endorsement - Weyrich
CBN News ^
| 11/5/2007
| David Brody
Posted on 11/05/2007 1:17:00 PM PST by Bosco
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: LibLieSlayer
“We know these poeple are not in it for GOD but for money and power.”
Bingo.. we have a winner..
To: Bosco
Now that is an answer to prayer. Conservatives unite! You will have to sacrifice fewer of your conservative principles, and less of your pride to support Mitt, than a Baptist Minister supporting a Mormon for President.
42
posted on
11/05/2007 2:34:45 PM PST
by
mission9
(Be a citizen worth living for, in a Nation worth dying for...)
To: LibLieSlayer
We know these poeple are not in it for GOD but for money and power. I'm absolutely certain that if Weyrich had endorsed Thompson, that you would have said the very same thing. /sarcasm
43
posted on
11/05/2007 2:37:12 PM PST
by
Spiff
(<------ Click here for updated polling results. Go Mitt! www.mittromney.com)
To: Bosco
American Liar
![](http://home.alltel.net/petronski/willard.jpg)
"Ronald Reagan was adamantly pro-choice."
44
posted on
11/05/2007 2:38:01 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Here we go, Steelers. Here we go!)
To: elizabetty
I’m tired of these compromises. I think I will support Hunter and keep my conscience.
45
posted on
11/05/2007 2:44:47 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: fieldmarshaldj
“Everyone who supports Romney is bought and paid for, duped, stupid, mistaken”
Finally. Some honesty.
Your both talking nonsense.
Take a moment of calm rationality and answer one question for me.
I like both Romney and Thompson, but I want to know why he didn’t endorse Thompson? He wasn’t bought. Give me an honest answer to why you think he didn’t endorse Thompson.
I want to know.
To: broncobilly
The question was already answered:
Everyone who supports Romney is bought and paid for, duped, stupid, mistaken — The money shot from a Mittwitt.
47
posted on
11/05/2007 2:50:07 PM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: Spiff
Fred, who tells the truth even when it isn’t what some want to hear and willard who says whatever people want to hear. No comparison.
LLS
48
posted on
11/05/2007 2:51:45 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: fieldmarshaldj
The money shot from a Mittwitt.
You disappoint me. You seem to be an intelligent, informed person, but you refuse to give me an objective answer.
I guess I will have to find it out from Weyrich himself.
To: redgirlinabluestate
Two of my favorite people are on this list:
- U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC)
- Sheriff Joe Arpaio - Maricopa County, Arizona
Mitt isn't my first choice, but he at least acts as if he has to earn the nomination, and not acting like it is an entitlement.
I really don't understand what he has or hasn't done to generate such hostility among certain elements. All things considered, I'd rank him behind Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter, but roughly even with Fred Thompson. Thompson seems to have a bit more conservative voting record, but he was representing a fairly conservative state unlike Mitt, who was governor of the most hopeless Lieberal state in the union.
I'm guessing that DeMint and Arpaio know what they're doing.
50
posted on
11/05/2007 2:56:55 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Vigilanteman
Arpaio endorsed Butch Napolitano for Governor in AZ. He’s no stranger to endorsing liberals.
51
posted on
11/05/2007 2:58:18 PM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: Vigilanteman
Thanks. You express many of my thoughts. Tancredo and Hunter are great, but they don’t seem to attract much support. However, I hope we will see more of them in a Republican administration.
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
53
posted on
11/05/2007 3:05:25 PM PST
by
TheLion
(How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
To: broncobilly
they are congressmen. they won’t get support even from FR as long as we have this “whatever it takes to win” or “anybody but Rudy” mentality. I think people are a little tired of Fred and Romney and are turning towards Huck. They won’t be happy with him either. why not get straight to the point and vote for what you wanted in the first place?
54
posted on
11/05/2007 3:08:20 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: Petronski
Romney Scores Major Endorsement - Paul Weyrich
![](http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/1227/frpetwillardpd1.jpg)
55
posted on
11/05/2007 3:08:22 PM PST
by
restornu
(Improve The Shining Moment! Don't let them pass you by... PRESS FORWARD MITT)
To: ejonesie22
There is something afoot with these endorsements.
This will have a huge impact on the Romney campaign. /s
BTW, I'm a born-again, Conservative Christian; who's Paul Weyrich?
56
posted on
11/05/2007 3:09:23 PM PST
by
no dems
(Don't hate me and call me names because you can't reply to my posts intelligently.)
To: Petronski
MICHAEL REAGAN
The son of President Reagan wrote the following in Human Events:
Some Republicans insist that the only perfect candidate would be a clone of my Dad, Ronald Reagan. Aside from the fact that there is no such thing, its important to recognize that Ronald Reagan, as he often admitted, was anything but perfect.
One of the criticisms about former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney focuses on his record concerning the abortion issue. We are told by the modern day Diogenes clones that he cant be trusted to fight abortion because he once, more or less, supported a womans right to butcher her baby.
It may come as a surprise to these purists, but Ronald Reagan once supported abortion too. Yet nobody ever questioned his strong pro-life credentials after his conversion to Republicanism. They accepted his sincerity. Why cant they accept Mitt Romneys?
Romneys record shows he should be totally acceptable to all conservatives, yet because of one dubious question concerning the validity of his conversion to the pro-life side, he is deemed unsuitable to carry the conservative banner.
57
posted on
11/05/2007 3:10:42 PM PST
by
TheLion
(How about "Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement," for a change)
To: restornu
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Rooster_Weather_Vane.jpg/397px-Rooster_Weather_Vane.jpg)
hey you should've seen that coming
58
posted on
11/05/2007 3:11:28 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: Bosco
Won’t help him here...but then Romney isn’t running for President of Free Republic. ;)
59
posted on
11/05/2007 3:14:34 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: TheLion
The Democrats, like Carville, really like Romney (because he will lose).
![](http://www.mangledcat.com/archives/20070222_025843_Romney-President-Poll.gif)
![](http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/james_carville1.jpg)
James Carville: "It's a feel-good story, this Romney thing. Romney is an ascendant guy."
60
posted on
11/05/2007 3:17:21 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-148 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson