First, that’s on FR, pissant. Don’t confuse FR political knowledge/exuberance for national figures.
Secondly, ejonesie22 is right when he says Hunter is too ‘stone club’ for this issue at this time. If we’re going to win this fight we have to fight smart. And smart to me means first overturning RvW; with the accent on FIRST.
Hunter has every intention of overturning RvW. Through legislative action, appointing pro-life judges and through the amendment process. But this is not the only issue that differentiates the two men. So all I can tell you is good luck. I got lotsa people to convince to vote for Hunter. Not just on FR, obviously.
Hunter isn’t too “stone club”. He is straightforward and direct and that’s what America needs and deserves. I will leave the practicing of Taquiya to the islamo-fascists. When Reagan made his “evil empire” speech, those who opposed him used the same arguments with which you seem to be adhering. Reagan needed to be more finessed, less direct, and not be such a “stone clubber” to borrow your terminology.
Russia was an evil empire, abortion is an inherent evil, no nuance or finesse required. People admire the courage of conviction and people need to hear the “inherently evil” speech not be served some posturing, leveraging, mincing, “get me elected” political dance. The people, the children, the next generation of voters are listening; Which message do you want them to hear?