Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale

It sounds all very speculative. I am skeptical of the idea that Matthew didn’t write Matthew in the absence of any definitive proof. Scholars often try to make their bones by these sorts of theories. Shakespeare is an example where they try to credit his work to others. This is what a friend of mine calls “a pipe and beer question”-fun to ponder and talk about but pretty fruitless in terms of increasing knowledge.
I am also skeptical about Matthew being written in Hebrew. Koine Greek or aramaic is more likely. Do you know of any early versions found that were in Hebrew?


96 posted on 11/06/2007 12:45:46 PM PST by Busywhiskers (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Busywhiskers

The source Matthew was in Hebrew. The Gospel of Matthew is a different work.


97 posted on 11/06/2007 12:48:40 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson