Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hildy
"I think Mr. Dale is still living in 1980's America...I'm not saying that as an insult..but his demographic analysis just doesn't hold up...as recent numbers spell out."

I am very much alive in the 21st century, and working for pro-life and pro-2nd Amendment causes. The only demographic analysis that matters will be who the social/religious conservatives cast their votes for in November 2008. It will not be for a liberal, pro-abortion, gun-grabbing socialist.

"All that being said, if modern Conservatism would actually work to put Hillary in the White House it's not a group I want anything to do with, nor would Ronald Reagan support. REMEMBER, Rudy worked for Reagan. It's just infuriating and I'm hoping that this mindset changes if and when the time comes. I know the Conservatives on this website love this country first and foremost and I do respect how they feel. But this hatred towards anything Guiliani is just over the top and becoming unseemly."

Rudy Giuliani was a mistake by Reagan. Any true Reagan conservative would recognize that. The hatred against Giuliani is a figment of your imagination. The real travesty is that the Giuliani people refuse to open their eyes to Giuliani's contempt to pro-life, pro-2nd Amendment voters, and to the Constitution itself.

"I ask Rudy haters here...who do you think Ronald Reagan would vote for in a Rudy/Hillary matchup???"

First of all, Ronald Reagan would not have sat idly by and allowed the attempted takeover of the GOP by the New York liberal wing of the party. In this case, he would have gone with a third party candidate to preserve Conservative principles.

79 posted on 11/04/2007 12:53:46 PM PST by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: TommyDale

“First of all, Ronald Reagan would not have sat idly by and allowed the attempted takeover of the GOP by the New York liberal wing of the party. In this case, he would have gone with a third party candidate to preserve Conservative principles.”

BUMP


84 posted on 11/04/2007 1:02:12 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: TommyDale; Hildy
Rudy Giuliani was a mistake by Reagan. Any true Reagan conservative would recognize that.

And after a couple of years, Reagan demoted him.

85 posted on 11/04/2007 1:03:44 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: TommyDale

The simple fact is that no one on this site knows what RR would do today. He was the right man for his time and his time has come and gone. The principals he stood for are still alive and well, but there will never be another Ronald Reagan. Let’s not continue to project “WHAT” RR would do today. It is all idle speculation with no foundation in fact. If we are counting on another of RR to save this election, we are all doomed. It is time to deal in the reality of the present moment and do our best to elect a republican, even if flawed in certain areas.


96 posted on 11/04/2007 1:36:02 PM PST by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson