To: Stoat
I have always thought we should not have allowed Japan to surrender so easily. We should have bombed them for another six months to a year. They wanted to live like animals and we should have reduced them to that state. We were to soft to our enemies. Our leaders were only wanting to make a lot of money off the war.
147 posted on
11/04/2007 2:48:41 AM PST by
Lewite
(Praise YAHWEH and Proclaim His Wonderful Name! Islam, the end time Beast-the harlot of Babylon.)
To: Lewite
This thread is three months late.
These usually show up on FR in August.
149 posted on
11/04/2007 2:52:58 AM PST by
AmericanInTokyo
(Visit this thread 1-hour from now. In that time, an average of 416.6 more ILLEGALS will be in the US)
To: Lewite
Very un-Christian attitude.
The atomic bombs were to win the war fast, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki should have been bombed. The bombing shouldn't have been to get payback or to punish the entire Japanese nation, including babies and young children. They should have been bombed until they surrendered--which is basically what happened. After surrender, the bombing should have ceased, and individual Japanese could be prosecuted.
Motive. Motive.
150 posted on
11/04/2007 2:55:57 AM PST by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
To: Lewite
The Romans pioneered the "soft on the enemies" thing in what are now called "The Social War(s)".
It worked; a powerful Roman Republic was created. They conquered the world and spread their culture, and paved the way for a higher ethic we call Christianity.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson