Slippery Hillary loses her aura of inevitability

The Sunday Times (of London) ^ | November 4, 2007 | Andrew Sullivan

[McBuff]

it is rather amazing that simply putting a smile on her face completely changes her look. ..and that was the only alteration. . .CHILLING!

[jwh_Denver]

It scares to think how right you may be. We’re in big trouble if she wins. Far more than I thought before.

[Radix]

"BTW, how do you make an image appear in a post?"

Use Outlook Express, copy image into an E-mail....then click the Source button and copy/paste to post everything between Body and Body including body and body and the little "<" and ">".

Whatever the image. It must be hosted on Internet somewhere,.

[4woodenboats]

Her answers seemed always designed not to express her real views – if, after all these years of positioning, she can be said to have any real views left – but pure calculation. She did this to herself. Probably tired, a little cranky and more than a little overconfident, the veil fell and the old “say anything to get or keep power” Clinton emerged into the stage-light.

Hill-arious article, thanks!

[Thebaddog]

Third row down far left. That’[s my vote for the real Satan.

[Verginius Rufus]

Jimmy Carter is still eligible too...they have no shortage of Nobel Prize winners to choose from.

C-SPAN this morning on the call-in program had a notice saying it was 365 days until the election. They seem to have forgotten that 2008 is a leap year.

[rfreedom4u]

I wonder if she would do well in dealing with the arab countries. They already see women as less than men. Would she wear a head scarf? A veil? Burkha? Would the arabs see her as she trult is...a man with boobs?

[Suzy Quzy]

WOW!! No mention of homosexuality!! Good going, ANdy!!

[Suzy Quzy]

Hillary is the CLASSIC BULLY!!! When someone stands up to her she starts crying FOUL!! She has RUINED many, many, MANY LIVES and reputations......she has an unquenchable thirst for power....she is DANGEROUS.

[Suzy Quzy]

No kidding....she would crack if they really did pile on and ask her tough questions and follow-up....but hey, they want to LIVE.

[Suzy Quzy]

Would you PLEASE post that on EVERY Hillary thread!!!

[alrea]

That is incredible.

[longtermmemmory]

yes.

Giuliani is Hillary.

[Victor]

Thanks and a big PING

[ari-freedom]

she makes martha stewart look less evil

[Piquaboy]

She does have an aura about her. Sort of like a dead carp.

[Blood of Tyrants]

I don’t count that because the Gipper was firmly at the helm.

[RipSawyer]

Mrs. Clinton has a lot of weak points as a nominee, and God forbid, a president. But she stands head and shoulders above the dem pack both in organization, presentation and competence.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You may be right as far as that goes but the fact that Obama, Edwards and Clinton are the best the Democrats can put forward as candidates for commander-in-chief during a war (whether or not Americans choose to realize that it is one), is enough to make me want to find a cave somewhere back in the hills and stock it with canned beans and weapons. I find it hard to accept that we have citizens stupid enough to vote for any one of these three.