Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Courage Needed to Disarm Iran
Forbes ^ | 11/3/2007 | Paul Johnson

Posted on 11/03/2007 1:41:18 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

Whatever you may think of President George W. Bush and his record, there's no denying him one character trait: courage. He has never been deterred from doing what he believes to be right by fear or nervousness. And courage, as we constantly need remind ourselves, is indispensable to successful statesmanship. It may be that Mr. Bush will need to display a supreme act of courage before leaving the White House: to decide what the U.S. response will be to Iran's efforts to acquire an aggressive nuclear capability. This should not be left for Mr. Bush's successor to deal with early in his or her presidency.

Of course, the easy way out would be to leave the decision and action to Israel, confining U.S. participation to ensuring that the action is adequate and successful. Israel has always been the prime target of an Iranian nuclear bomb and the chief reason that the Ahmadinejad regime is striving so hard to make one. Of course, Iran's government is not representative of the majority of its people. Most, being sensible and civilized, have no desire to engage in a nuclear war with Israel--or in any other war for that matter.

But the regime, run by fanatics, is likely to remain in power for the foreseeable future. It has made many statements regarding the acquisition of nuclear power, some of them obvious lies and others contradictory. But in view of Iran's declared policy toward Israel--that it will be content with nothing less than Israel's eradication--we must assume that once the regime acquires nuclear weapons it will use them against Israel at the earliest opportunity.

That is certainly the view taken by the Israelis. The country is too small and fragile to survive even a single nuclear strike from Iran. Such a brutal and evil act would be a second Holocaust, one from which the Jewish people might never recover. Therefore, if Iran persists in its plans, it's only a matter of time before the Israelis will be obliged to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities. In September Israel apparently acted against a putative nuclear weapons plant in Syria--successfully. It has chosen to keep silent about this strike, presumably because it serves as a dress rehearsal and experience-gathering operation for a similar but much larger strike against Iran.

Certainly Israel's preemptive strike plans against Iran are well advanced and constantly being improved. In the last resort, I believe Israel could conduct such a military operation on its own and in such a way as to delay Iran's acquisition of nuclear power for many years. Nevertheless, to leave it to the Israelis would be both cowardly and imprudent.

The Anglo-French use of Israel as a surrogate invader of Egypt during the 1956 Suez War is an example of dishonesty that we now should bear in mind: It did not work. The collusion involved was quickly exposed and seen by the world--notably the Eisenhower Administration--as dishonorable and squalid. It damaged Britain's position in the Middle East, as well as the West's as a whole, with no countervailing military advantage.

Plain Speaking

The U.S. would be wise to avoid any such subterfuge. If one has justice on one's side, it always pays to be honest and open. If Iran persists in its nuclear efforts, then at a certain point Mr. Bush should make his intentions clear--and in the following terms.

"Let those who currently rule Iran take heed, for this will be our only warning. Israel is a democracy and America's friend and ally. A nuclear attack or any other act of aggression against Israel and its people is totally unacceptable to the U.S.

"If at any point the Israelis judge an Iranian nuclear assault on their people to be feasible--and this is confirmed by our own intelligence sources--the U.S. will not only support an Israeli preemptive strike against Iranian facilities but also give the Israeli armed forces any assistance they may need to make such a strike effective.

"Furthermore, in certain circumstances the U.S. may judge it to be in its own national interest to participate directly in the destruction of an Iranian nuclear weapons capability. The Iranian regime must therefore realize that its pursuit of nuclear weapons will be interpreted as tantamount to a declaration of war against Israel and even the U.S. itself. In such circumstances American action in self-defense will take place on whatever scale deemed necessary--using whatever weapons are appropriate--and will commence without warning."

In my view the U.S. should find an early occasion to issue such a declaration. The Ahmadinejad regime holds power increasingly by force and terror. It may be, then, that the Iranian people--or even the armed forces--would be encouraged to replace those men leading them into a catastrophic conflict against a nuclear-armed Israel, as well as the world's strongest military power. At any rate, America's position would be clear beyond any possible doubt. Such a declaration also might persuade those nations whose attitudes toward Iran's possession of nuclear weapons have been ambivalent to recognize just how dangerous Iran's current policies are and seek to change them.

For President Bush to grasp the nettle in such a way, and in good time, will take courage. But as we all know, courage is not a virtue he lacks.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; iraniannukes; pauljohnson

1 posted on 11/03/2007 1:41:19 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
For President Bush to grasp the nettle in such a way, and in good time, will take courage. But as we all know, courage is not a virtue he lacks.

Well said.

He has it however he is fighting a congress and American people who if asked couldn't place definition on the word courage.

2 posted on 11/03/2007 2:26:19 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
He has never been deterred from doing what he believes to be right by fear or nervousness

Very true. And he isn't afraid to go ahead and do something despite the moonbat backlash and scathing protests. The anti-war nutsos derail our President more than they ever speak out against any terrorist; some even go so far as to bring "Kill Bush" signs to protests (and there's the ever-present "Bush is the world's #1 terrorist" sign as well). And then of course there's the eternal "Bush's fault"; he gets blamed for just about everything. The guy puts up with an incredible amount of bullcrap, insults, threats, and unjustified accusations, yet he isn't afraid to do what must be done. All the while juggling that with dealing with the inept, incompetent, out-of-control 110th Congress.

Yeah he is wrong on amnesty and stuff, which isn't good, but no President is perfect, and he's a better choice to have in the WH than anyone the Democrat party ever nominated to run in the last two elections.
3 posted on 11/03/2007 2:37:20 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (Pelosi--pissed off Turkey, supported SCHIP, really jerky, and full of sh|t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Iran has also threatened to wipe out the United States. Its leaders want a world free of the Little Satan - Israel and the Great Satan - the U.S. So its imperative on us to disarm Iran of its capability to bring about a nuclear Armageddon.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 11/03/2007 2:45:39 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Iran has also threatened to wipe out the United States. Its leaders want a world free of the Little Satan - Israel and the Great Satan - the U.S. So its imperative on us to disarm Iran of its capability to bring about a nuclear Armageddon.

I agree completely.

Of course, the leadership's apocalyptic views may cause them to acually wish for a nuclear exchange, in order to hasten the End Times, and usher in the re-appearance of the Twelfth Imam. But if so, perhaps we sould give them the war they (think) they want.

5 posted on 11/03/2007 3:00:44 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid". Ronald Wilson Reagan 1982

"Courage is the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees all others". Winston Churchill

6 posted on 11/03/2007 6:28:38 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (NY Times: "fake but accurate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson