[stevem]

I guess I never believed the nonsense about Rudy and adoption in the first place. It's like the idiocy of the liberals all these years, "We want abortions to be legal, safe and rare.

If they are safe and legal why should they be rare?

If abortion is legal, why should we waste money storing kids for adoption.

The abortion industry is a true quagmire. I have always found it the least bit insincere that polititians who identify themselves as pro abortion are always trying to distance themselves from that fact. Do they consider their stance unclean?

[Sun]

“I have always found it the least bit insincere that polititians who identify themselves as pro abortion are always trying to distance themselves from that fact. Do they consider their stance unclean?”

Good point, and why do they call abortion “choice?”

[hunter112]

If they are safe and legal why should they be rare?

I've always answered the 'safe, legal and rare' comment with "What other 'Constitutional' rights need to be 'rare'? Should we have fewer newspapers, less diversity of religion, less jury trials because more arbitrary judges are deciding guilt, or less freedom of speech and assembly?"

They don't come back with the answer of guns, because in the pea-sized brain of a liberal, there is no Constitutional right to own a weapon.