Scientists Acknowledge AIDS Crisis is Distorted and Overblown - Part I
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Yet obviously the world is filled with sluts, and the virus--and AIDS with it--has spread to a sizable population.
Oh, and the United States has one of the largest AIDS-ridden populations in the developed world, both in terms of percentage and definitely in numbers (since the United States is easily the most populous developed country, and the second, Japan, has a very low HIV/AIDS rate).
Good for Bill Gates. Pity he backed down.
I had no idea federal research funds were so unbalanced. Having seen my father-in-law struggle with heart disease and Alzheimer's, and my father with diabetes, heart attack and prostate cancer, I would prefer a re-apportionment of federal research dollars, or even a re-apportionment/reduction.
The biggest error is the failure of an admission about AIDS, in the conception of public policy and in public perception; the admission that unlike a flu virus, contagious meningitis, the plague, or similar “pandemic” affecting diseases, HIV cannot be acquired by casual contact and without direct exchange of body fluids, into a blood-opening in the skin, HIV is difficult to transmit.
Therefore, the prevention of its transmission is in fact not difficult to achieve, once understood, and only ignorance or lack of making the right choices allows its continued transmission. Were it not for human ignorance and the failure of human choices, there would be little cause for continued massive investment on AIDS prevention - the HIV virus would have died in the world already by lack of hosts to continue it. Some people take those facts as harsh. The truth is harsh sometimes. If half the money spent on killing it with drugs was spent on stopping its transmission, the “epidemic” would end and the balance of the effort could be used to care better for those already infected.
Its not that we have not expanded immensely the human knowledge about the human immune system, because of AIDS - we have - but it has come as a result of trying to cure something that need not have gained the demographic scale and dimensions it did, if prevention (usually the first point of human efforts against disease) had been kept at the heart of the battle.
Hell if you believed the BS reported in scientific journals etc back in the 80s we would all be dead from AIDS by now
Exposed by Michael Fumento in 1989 in his book The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS.
Written at the height of the "heterosexual breakout" hysteria, Fumento was slammed by the AIDS pimps. As it turned out of course, he was right and they all were wrong. Good to see his findings validated by new research.