Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
One reason why are standard of living is higher today is the dual incomes. Most married women in the thirties did not work outside the home.

How many families today would live like they do if you took the wife's income out of the picture?

226 posted on 11/02/2007 8:47:02 AM PDT by am452 (If you don't stand behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: am452

Are you proposing to make dual incomes illegal? Please elaborate.


227 posted on 11/02/2007 8:51:27 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: am452

That’s a valid point, but even if every married woman with kids gave up their job outside the home our standard of living would still be several orders of magnitude higher than it was back in the 1930s.


230 posted on 11/02/2007 8:59:37 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: am452
One reason why are standard of living is higher today is the dual incomes.

Then how would you explain the real increases in per-capita income and per-capita consumption in this country?

241 posted on 11/02/2007 9:17:54 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: am452
>>>>>>>One reason why are standard of living is higher today is the dual incomes. Most married women in the thirties did not work outside the home. How many families today would live like they do if you took the wife's income out of the picture?

BINGO! The fact that most families now have two wage earners has helped mask our relative economic decline, as shown by the fact that we've gone from having a third of the population taking home roughly 45% of the GNP in wages in the postwar period to the situation of today, where those two numbers are reversed. In real dollars, wages have been largely stagnant for decades. Of course, this purely economic analysis doesn't take into account all the family and societal problems caused by the need to have two wage earners instead of one in a family.

259 posted on 11/02/2007 9:33:23 AM PDT by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson