[[Scientists being denied tenure does not mean they cannot obtain funding for research by private companies or, more likely, the various religious bodies that believe in ID]]
After all- being a ‘speudoscience’ doesn’t entitle them to public fundings liek ‘real science’
[[Let’s discuss that issue: why haven’t these ID scientists been given funding from private corporations and/or churches? If there is potential there, why would it be ignored?]]
They are being funded as best as they can be
[[Are you saying the Darwinists control every company and all the churches?]]
never implied that
[[If you cannopt falsify a theory, you cannot call it science. But, I am very willing to be corrected here. Just tell me how to falsify ID.]]
Boy howdy do I have good news for you then- ID IS falsifiable- Next objection?
[[But you have many people at the Discovery Institute and other such places that do believe in a designer, and are (from what I read) steering their research as appropriate, correct?]]
The Discovery institute, or even ICR are not the backbone of Intelligent design science- they are independent branches of hte hypothesis of intelligent design- their own personal beliefs OUTSIDE of the hypothesis of Intelligent Design is irrelevent to the hypothesis of intelligent design itself.
[[What have they come up with? What new branches of research has been opened?]]
I point you to both unccomondescent.com and creationsafari.com for more research and discoveries than you can shake a stick at- I also point you toward Behe’s site, as well as ICR and many others
[[That is a long time to produce “design-based” research, theories, etc. Yet, we still see nothing of that type. Why]]
Nothing? Lol- I guess your blinders don’t have peepholes eh?
I asked for "how". Please explain HOW to falsify it.
I point you to both unccomondescent.com and creationsafari.com for more research and discoveries than you can shake a stick at
Well, I went to Creationsafaris.com. There is a link there which cites "practical applications in the Christian life". They go on to list "fitness, wisdom, and Witnessing" as practical applications. I did not find a single ID discovery, unfortunately. There are multitudes of references to geological, biological, and other sciences, but I cannot find anything with ID as the source. Would you mind linking me something?
I think it's alot odd you cite Behe. He accepts common descent.