Posted on 11/01/2007 5:16:44 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
Hillary Clinton
Another highlight from that conference call with Hillary strategist Mark Penn:
One caller from Oklahoma City said that "the questions ... were designed to incite a brawl," and that Russert's and Brian William's moderating was "an abdication of journalistic responsibility."
Another said Russert "should be shot," before quickly adding that she shouldn't say that on a conference call.
Penn and Mantz said they were hearing a lot of the same sentiment from other supporters, but they do not plan to engage the media or the debate's moderators...
(Excerpt) Read more at campaignspot.nationalreview.com ...
..."and then she..LOLOL..she..LOLOL..she sez it...vast..LOLOL...vast right ...LOLOL..vast right wing conspiracy....quick take me for a walk before I ruin the carpet"
Tim Russert should probably be on suicide watch. Poor guy. Take away his razor.
That is the best pic. I just love it.
The fact that Hillary has resorted already to the “everybody’s picking on me” defense smacks of discouragement.
I thought she would save the victim role until the general election campaign, not pull it out in the primaries.
It’s not going to play well to be a whining victim for a whole year.
I wonder if she will give a yes or no answer the next time it is asked of her.
Ha, it is unlikely that it will be asked again....it will be deemed “material already covered.”
Whine, whine, whine. And the primaries haven’t even started yet. What are they going to do if Hitlery’s elected, and she runs into some serious opposition, foreign or domestic? Whine that it’s unfair?
“What say you to all of this?”
“I’m shocked.”
So is Claude Rains.
There. I fixed it.
I notice Hillary didn’t do her laughter during the debate, I am glad that the word got out that she uses her laughter to hide her anger, she sure did look angry that night. Of course, I didn’t watch the whole debate, the Democrats are much too boring to watch, being that everything they say is based on lies, it’s just not particularily interesting to watch a group of people speak for over an hour when none of them are willing to speak from the heart since it would conflict with the message they are trying to get across.
Sheesh, I need some coffee. I misread your term “anger cackle” as cankle.
Normally, yes, but this time I figured that Barry O and the Silky Pony were going to make their move. The NYS driver license question sure gave them some raw meat, and they shook it in their jaws for all they were worth. But, on the other hand, I didn't watch the whole thing either, I was working on my very best spaghetti sauce to date...
Dude, find me a more typical example of Leninist thinking, dude! Wake up America, dudes!
I didn’t see all of the debate either, but I heard she was asked about the NY state illegal driver’s licences, she defended Gov. Spitzer (spinning the question with her answer) and Russert couldn’t accept that-—bottom line, she flip flopped like John Kerry on the end of a hook on a rowboat floor and The Breck Girl and Hussein “ears” Obama held her accountable for their confusion. It was an extreme enjoyment watching the hatred pour out of her eyes and it was the closest I’ve ever seen her to being accountable. I fully understand how Clinton inc. blames Russert and the “he should be shot” sounds like Bill’s anger, but more correctly, I believe it’s both.
“F’n mick b*stard!”
Can I add a simple “amen”?
Apologize? Before this is resolved, Tim will be the one apologizing. No one expects any Clinton to apologize. That’s the way the American people are.
I agree.
;o)))
Yes, she is somewhat Leninist, but mostly just clintoid. Remember too what her friend “Hanoi” Jane said: if the American people understood Marx and Lenin, they get on their knees that pray that we would all be communist.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.