Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Supporter On Conference Call: Tim Russert 'Should Be Shot'
National Review Online ^ | 11/01/2007 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 11/01/2007 5:16:44 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist

..."and then she..LOLOL..she..LOLOL..she sez it...vast..LOLOL...vast right ...LOLOL..vast right wing conspiracy....quick take me for a walk before I ruin the carpet"

41 posted on 11/01/2007 6:41:39 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Tim Russert should probably be on suicide watch. Poor guy. Take away his razor.


42 posted on 11/01/2007 6:42:33 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

That is the best pic. I just love it.


43 posted on 11/01/2007 6:51:12 PM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

44 posted on 11/01/2007 6:55:20 PM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

The fact that Hillary has resorted already to the “everybody’s picking on me” defense smacks of discouragement.

I thought she would save the victim role until the general election campaign, not pull it out in the primaries.

It’s not going to play well to be a whining victim for a whole year.


45 posted on 11/01/2007 7:01:19 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I wonder if she will give a yes or no answer the next time it is asked of her.

Ha, it is unlikely that it will be asked again....it will be deemed “material already covered.”


46 posted on 11/01/2007 7:06:02 PM PDT by Radix (When I became a man, I put away childish things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The Hildabeast responds:


47 posted on 11/01/2007 7:08:05 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Whine, whine, whine. And the primaries haven’t even started yet. What are they going to do if Hitlery’s elected, and she runs into some serious opposition, foreign or domestic? Whine that it’s unfair?


48 posted on 11/01/2007 7:24:53 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“What say you to all of this?”
“I’m shocked.”

So is Claude Rains.


49 posted on 11/01/2007 7:27:29 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Penn and Mantz said they were hearing a lot of the same sentiment from other supporters, but they do not plan to engage the media or the debate's moderators...publicly.

There. I fixed it.

50 posted on 11/01/2007 7:29:27 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

I notice Hillary didn’t do her laughter during the debate, I am glad that the word got out that she uses her laughter to hide her anger, she sure did look angry that night. Of course, I didn’t watch the whole debate, the Democrats are much too boring to watch, being that everything they say is based on lies, it’s just not particularily interesting to watch a group of people speak for over an hour when none of them are willing to speak from the heart since it would conflict with the message they are trying to get across.


51 posted on 11/01/2007 7:30:17 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

Sheesh, I need some coffee. I misread your term “anger cackle” as cankle.


52 posted on 11/01/2007 7:41:45 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
Of course, I didn’t watch the whole debate, the Democrats are much too boring to watch...

Normally, yes, but this time I figured that Barry O and the Silky Pony were going to make their move. The NYS driver license question sure gave them some raw meat, and they shook it in their jaws for all they were worth. But, on the other hand, I didn't watch the whole thing either, I was working on my very best spaghetti sauce to date...

53 posted on 11/01/2007 7:43:41 PM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Dude, find me a more typical example of Leninist thinking, dude! Wake up America, dudes!


54 posted on 11/01/2007 7:45:52 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (We all need someone we can bleed on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

I didn’t see all of the debate either, but I heard she was asked about the NY state illegal driver’s licences, she defended Gov. Spitzer (spinning the question with her answer) and Russert couldn’t accept that-—bottom line, she flip flopped like John Kerry on the end of a hook on a rowboat floor and The Breck Girl and Hussein “ears” Obama held her accountable for their confusion. It was an extreme enjoyment watching the hatred pour out of her eyes and it was the closest I’ve ever seen her to being accountable. I fully understand how Clinton inc. blames Russert and the “he should be shot” sounds like Bill’s anger, but more correctly, I believe it’s both.


55 posted on 11/01/2007 8:36:09 PM PDT by BerryDingle (Illegitimi Non Carborundum (Don't let the bastards wear you down))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

“F’n mick b*stard!”


56 posted on 11/01/2007 8:39:51 PM PDT by Peelod (I do renounce Hillary! and all her pomps and works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: skimask

Can I add a simple “amen”?


57 posted on 11/01/2007 8:43:01 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Apologize? Before this is resolved, Tim will be the one apologizing. No one expects any Clinton to apologize. That’s the way the American people are.


58 posted on 11/01/2007 8:44:11 PM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I agree.

;o)))


59 posted on 11/01/2007 8:44:31 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Yes, she is somewhat Leninist, but mostly just clintoid. Remember too what her friend “Hanoi” Jane said: if the American people understood Marx and Lenin, they get on their knees that pray that we would all be communist.”


60 posted on 11/01/2007 8:45:53 PM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson