Skip to comments.
Hillary Supporter On Conference Call: Tim Russert 'Should Be Shot'
National Review Online ^
| 11/01/2007
| Jim Geraghty
Posted on 11/01/2007 5:16:44 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Shot? What about journalistic freedom and freedom of speech?
Journalistic Responsibility? Do they mean they were responsible for making sure that all the Dems got softball questions or that Hillary should never, ever be asked questions that she can't mince words on, reduce to a game of semantics, or engage in triangulation with?
Will Chillary apologize to Tim Russert for what the conference caller said? Will she say go away from this campaign to her?
To: All
What say you to all of this?
2
posted on
11/01/2007 5:17:42 PM PDT
by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
3
posted on
11/01/2007 5:18:57 PM PDT
by
golfisnr1
(Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Typical liberal response. Slience all opposition. Free speech only applies to those who agree with the liberal mantra.
4
posted on
11/01/2007 5:20:24 PM PDT
by
skimask
(Support Terrorism......Vote Democratic)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I agree. As a so-called journalist he should be shot, stuffed and mounted. But not for Tuesday night's performance. That was almost enough to redeem his journalistic integrity.
-Joan
5
posted on
11/01/2007 5:20:47 PM PDT
by
JoanVarga
(Primordial Slack)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Dear Timmy, Don’t go near Ft. Marcy Park!!! The Clintonoids live by “Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?” amoerta.
6
posted on
11/01/2007 5:21:58 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Even the mob shied away from whacking reporters....perhaps they were more ethical.
7
posted on
11/01/2007 5:23:18 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(Someday it'll all make sense.....maybe.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Boohoohoo.. what a bunch of little sissies. The democrats are so freaking protected by the media that an absolutely legitimate question is considered “inciting”. Ill tell you what inciting is, the whole of the Anti American left in this country. They should be glad that they are not swinging from gallows.
8
posted on
11/01/2007 5:23:39 PM PDT
by
Archon of the East
(Universal Executive Power of the Law of Nature)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Well, I want to know what Huma thought of it. ;^)
9
posted on
11/01/2007 5:24:52 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
What say you to all of this?I'm shocked.
10
posted on
11/01/2007 5:25:06 PM PDT
by
null and void
(First reporter of the great (5.6) San Jose 'quake of '07...)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Russert is gonna be awfully upset to be lumped in with conservatives.
No more invitations to the chi-chi parties.
11
posted on
11/01/2007 5:26:05 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
How do you think Stalin got rid of nuissances?
12
posted on
11/01/2007 5:26:50 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
("I knew my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God and his was an idol.")
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
What say you to all of this?
How do they know it wasn't hillary? /s
13
posted on
11/01/2007 5:27:02 PM PDT
by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Another said Russert should be shot, before quickly adding that she shouldnt say that on a conference call.
Aw, come on Libs, Give peace a chance.
14
posted on
11/01/2007 5:27:51 PM PDT
by
FMBass
("Now that I'm sober I watch a lot of news"- Garofalo from Coulter's "Treason")
To: Archon of the East
This reminds of the debate with Lazio that Hillary had when she was running for Senator. Much was made over that too. I am tired of her supporters acting victimized whenever Hillary is called to task for her traitor ways. I hope whoever the Republican Nominee is, I hope that he incites the debates as much as he can. And I really don’t want to hear any bitching, moaning and complaining from Hillary’s supporters. They are so protected, they just don’t like being forced to be confronted by the truth. They need to get used to it.
To: FMBass
Gotta love those peace-loving libs.
16
posted on
11/01/2007 5:29:51 PM PDT
by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Yeah right, and next week the MSM(including Russert...he knows who butters his toast) will be telling everyone how Hilliary faced adversity for the first time in her campaign...and came out strong and victorious while showing the American people she IS battle tested and ready for the many challenges that a President will face.
Russert, Chris Matthews and the rest of the rich, liberal, elite Hampton's/NE caviar sucking media types?, LOL! give me a break, I've never bought their PC indoctrination snake oil brainwashing BS in the past, I'm not about to start buying it now.
This farce, liar, corruption filled, conniving, deceitful, shill of a candidate must be stopped, but these are definitely NOT the folks who you can trust to do the job. That'd be like trusting Michael Moore to watch over a bucket of chicken.
17
posted on
11/01/2007 5:30:27 PM PDT
by
RckyRaCoCo
(sing after me......de-por-ta-tion cha-cha-cha)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Potatohead may want to keep his Pets inside for a few weeks. She is a terrible candidate.
Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops
18
posted on
11/01/2007 5:31:42 PM PDT
by
bray
(Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
To: rodeo-mamma; All
I agree completely.
I mean, if Hillary can’t handle tough questions or a challenge from the male Democrat pres. candidates, how the hell is she going to be able to stand up to male terrorists, thugs and third world dictators?
19
posted on
11/01/2007 5:31:49 PM PDT
by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I heard the debate and thought Mr. Russert was too easy on her.
She didn’t give an answer to the question, didn’t even say she had no firm opinion on it. Just used the whole question to take a swipe at the president.
Russert should have pressed her.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson