 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Now wait a minute. If they are stumps that means someone cut them off, that means it is Bushes fault.
How is Algore going to explain why trees were growing in that area IF the temperatures were warm enough to have plants growing there?
< moonbat mode on>
Halliburton must have planted those stumps during the night.
< /moonbat mode>
gee, that would mean there wasn’t a glazer on top of it at one time????? Would that mean we had global COOLING????
Al Gore’s ancestors????
>>”It seems like an unprecedented change in a short amount of time,” Koch said. “From this work and many other studies looking at forcings of the climate system, one has to turn away from natural ones alone to explain this dramatic change of the past 150 years.”<<
I thought it was 7,000 years, not 150.
7,000 is quite a while.
And not just warm enough to grow some grasses on permafrost, warm enough to grow large trees. We are still deep in an ice age.
Hmm. Tree stumps.
Looks like it used to be warmer around those parts. I wonder who was to blame.
|
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
|
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Blam. |
||
|
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
Obviously only if "historic" is defined as within the past 7000 years -- a concept which would fly with Biblical creationists, but they aren't exactly the core of the global warming alarmism movement.
This CAN’T be possible!!!
Eerybody KNOWS the world is warmer than it ever had been!!
How could there POSSIBLY have been trees growing there?
I guess this is only a question the Inventor of the Internet can answer (Algore, are you out there?)
“It seems like an unprecedented change in a short amount of time,” Koch said.
Right. In the MILLIONS of years of earth’s history we are experiencing an “unprecedented” change. He knows. He checked every one of those millions of years!
Were they really burning oil back then and also using aerosol cans? That’s what I understand is the reason for global warming.
Why? Natural disasters and natural changes happen quickly. In one seconds-only earthquake, you can rip the land from one state to the other. In a fast-moving hurricane, you can rip cities to shreds. A sudden avalanche can completely reshape geologic formations. A meteor blasting in from outer space can suddenly fell an entire forest. We've all seen the weather change dramatically in a short matter of time. Nature isn't just the drip-drip-drip over time that gradually changes the earth, it is also the fast moving disasters that change the earth.
Is Al Gore really dumber than a stump?
Yes, apparently he is...
GOT Fire WOOD?
This find proves that these northern climes were once warm enough to grow forests, even before the presence of man and machines, thus giving the lie to anthropomorphic climate change.
When the next ice age hits, the climatologists will be just as surprised as the woolly mammoths were.
When things were warmer 7,000 years ago, there was not a city of 2,000,000 less than 40 miles from the glacier. Nor did Canada’s largest port (Vancouver) exist then. Nor did the trans-Canada highway exist then. Nor were there various industrial developments (including forestry). All of these things contribute to local warming and forms of pollution (e.g., dust) that can contribute to a glacier melting. These local factors would have to be eliminated before it could be claimed that the globe is as warm now as it was 7,000 years ago, but “scientists†on the Global Warming gravy train are incredibly lazy. The fact that the Medieval Warm Period did not cause such an extensive retreat of the glacier all but proves that the cause is not “Global Warming”.