Don't donate to your alma mater if that means subsidizing scum.
Does this mean we will be able to go to a ballgame for $1.50 again? Or to a movie for .25? I better quit while I’m ahead, I’m showing my age.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Howard. And take your fellow useful idiots with you.
If you want a laugh, click on the article and look at his picture. This Marxist nerd couldn’t change a light bulb, yet he’s “influential” to the left. I hope he gets lost on his way home and is never heard from again.
Better if we limit the income of liberal professors at liberal universities...that way they can understand the true effects of socialism
Sounds like the tree of liberty needs watered.
|
Now, let's see - if that income between four and five million a year should represent some entrepreneur's share of a new startup and you tell him you're going to confiscate it if he makes it, what happens to the startup? Is "disincentive" in Dr. Gardner's vocabulary? How about "common sense"?
How much money does a private university get to earn each year? Harvard University's endowment earned a 16.7 percent return during the year ending June 30, 2006, bringing the endowment's overall value to $29.2 billion.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
He apparently has multiple intelligences as well, all with factors of zero.
Oh, brother. Just what year was it that our most prestigious institutes of higher learning finally finished circling down the drain?
Huey Long lives!!!!!
I, for one, am all for the idea of secession. Let the people who want to live in a welfare state all go to one region and let them have it. Then they have have their social utopia and let the rest of us go back to a nation founded on the actual constitution.
It's really our only hope of averting a civil war.
Shall we take his advice and shoot him?
Why does anyone need more than 10 or 20 million dollar anyway?
One possibility is for corporations to issue two kinds of shares, control shares (which have little or no financial interest), and profit shares (which contain all the financial interest).
That way, people who’ve built big companies and want to retain control of them, without having to keep control of excess billions of dollars, can do so be retaining most or all of the control shares, while doing what they want with the profit shares, such as donating them to charities or foundations.
Harvard, eh? Supports my contention that MIT is the only school worth respecting in Boston. Harvard has become a joke (physics and math departments excepted, of course).
I suppose that's true, if grand theft is one of "our values."
I've said this before, and I'll say it again to this sort of person... "What right does the government have to money earned, well after the taxes were paid on it, and were paid on earnings gained from holding that property? The only 'right' the government would have on it would be through the assumption that all wealth and property actually belongs to the government, and that there's no right of personal property."
This sort of attitude disgusts me.
Mark
sarcasm > Please see the FR posting guidelines../sarcasm
Uhhh, yeah. Try selling that to the Hollyweird Liberal-Lefties.