Replies

I guess words such as, let he who is without sin cast the first stone and judge not lest ye be judged have no place in today’s Republican party, the one going down the tubes fast and losing elections?

Strange how the felony of extortion in this case is forgotten and all anyone cares about is Curtis’s orientation. For all the talk of the hurt he causes his family, who is keeping it going the most?

The Democrats want rid of any who oppose their agenda and we gleefully oblige. Saul Alinsky couldn’t do it better.

“I guess words such as, let he who is without sin cast the first stone and judge not lest ye be judged have no place in today’s Republican party, the one going down the tubes fast and losing elections?

Strange how the felony of extortion in this case is forgotten and all anyone cares about is Curtis’s orientation. For all the talk of the hurt he causes his family, who is keeping it going the most?

The Democrats want rid of any who oppose their agenda and we gleefully oblige. Saul Alinsky couldn’t do it better.”

Pardon me but I choose to hold Republicans to higher moral standards than I do Democrats. I can forgive the sinner and condemn the sin. In this case, the Senator Craig case and the Senator Vitter case, the sin is adultery.
If there is no difference in the moral standing of the two major parties, how does that benefit the Republican Party?
I don’t think that its very politically asute to hand your opposition moral equivalency on a silver platter: Clinton-Lewinsky, Jefferson, and Barney Frank versus Foley, Craig, Vitter and this guy.

“all anyone cares about is Curtis’s orientation”

Be careful about falling for the liberal talking points. It’s not an ‘orientation’ any more than pedophilia is. It’s a lifestyle choice and a very unhealthy one at that.