Replies

“I guess words such as, let he who is without sin cast the first stone and judge not lest ye be judged have no place in today’s Republican party, the one going down the tubes fast and losing elections?

Strange how the felony of extortion in this case is forgotten and all anyone cares about is Curtis’s orientation. For all the talk of the hurt he causes his family, who is keeping it going the most?

The Democrats want rid of any who oppose their agenda and we gleefully oblige. Saul Alinsky couldn’t do it better.”

Pardon me but I choose to hold Republicans to higher moral standards than I do Democrats. I can forgive the sinner and condemn the sin. In this case, the Senator Craig case and the Senator Vitter case, the sin is adultery.
If there is no difference in the moral standing of the two major parties, how does that benefit the Republican Party?
I don’t think that its very politically asute to hand your opposition moral equivalency on a silver platter: Clinton-Lewinsky, Jefferson, and Barney Frank versus Foley, Craig, Vitter and this guy.

I congratulate you on achieving a level of perfection that very few ever have. I assume you hold yourself to the same “higher moral standards” that you do others, right?

I can also appreciate your ostentatious effort at upholding the absolute purity of our imperfect party.

In my lowly standing, since no sin or crime was committed against me, I would leave it as a matter between he and his wife and God. I find living my own life difficult enough without trying to live other peoples.

But, you have shown me the folly of my ways. We must hold any ally we have in this fight against Socialism and the implementation of the Gay agenda to absolute moral perfection, or rid them from our midsts. If it results in less support for saving our country and the passing of such immoral legislation as same-sex marriage, so be it. At least we are pure, right?

Who should we rid ourselves of next, Tammy Bruce? Why not Rush Limbaugh as well? He did have that bout with prescription drugs and was caught with Viagra. We all know what that is for and at the time, he was divorced and single. Surely we cannot have someone so immoral as to engage in sex outside the marriage within the party, right?

After all, we must maintain purity. The safety and well being of our country is second to the party purity, right?

Maybe one day you will wake up and see that not every Gay individual supports the Gay agenda and they are on our side. Or, should I say "were," since their immorality must taint our precious party purity?