Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prostitutes' Photos, Case Details Put Online (Police Hope It Deters Crime...)
SignOnSanDiego.com ^ | October 30, 2007 | Mark Arner and Liz Neely

Posted on 10/30/2007 11:52:42 AM PDT by DogByte6RER

Prostitutes' photos, case details put online

Police hope it deters crime; clients' mug shots to come

By Mark Arner and Liz Neely

UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITERS

October 30, 2007

EL CAJON – Mug shots of convicted prostitutes are appearing on the El Cajon Police Department's Web site. Police hope to discourage them from plying their trade in town using a 21st-century version of public flogging.

Pictures of 11 women, details of their crimes and areas where they are banned from loitering were posted as of yesterday. Police said they plan to add pictures of convicted “johns” – the clients – within weeks. They are urging viewers to report when the offenders violate probation.

“Our Web site is always in revision,” said El Cajon police Chief Cliff Diamond. “We have always viewed it as a good intervention tool to keep our community apprised of crime trends, wanted persons and missing persons.”

Publication of convicted criminals' mug shots is the latest of several unconventional tactics that El Cajon and other cities have tried in recent years to discourage prostitution.

Twelve years ago, the La Mesa City Council tried to stifle such activity by publishing photos of convicted “johns” in the media. In July, El Cajon and National City were among several cities statewide that were told to abandon laws allowing them to impound vehicles of motorists who tried to buy sex on the streets. That tactic ended when the state Supreme Court ruled that cities could no longer seize vehicles of people suspected of soliciting prostitution.

In El Cajon, the number of prostitution arrests has decreased since a peak of 100 in 2003, when a large number of stings were conducted. After five stings this year, 25 arrests have been made.

The goal of putting the faces of convicted prostitutes on the Web “is to move them and the crimes that come with them out of our city,” said El Cajon police Special Investigations Sgt. Mike Hook.

The tactic has drawn mixed reactions.

Marjorie Cohn, a professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, said the Web site violates the women's right to privacy.

“It's an incredible invasion of the privacy of the women, with no real benefit to law enforcement,” Cohn said.

For some businesses along the corridors best known for prostitution activity in El Cajon, the high-tech approach is welcome.

“I think it's a good idea because we get a lot of them hanging around here,” said John Crisp, owner of Bath-Co Shower Door on Main Street east of Johnson Avenue. “It's not good for business.”

Larry Wilson, owner of Mustang Auto on El Cajon Boulevard near Wilson Avenue, said putting the pictures on the Internet will probably discourage prostitution in El Cajon. But he also wondered how to help those arrested.

“I think it's a good idea, but what do you do?” Wilson asked. “What can we do to help these people? These girls need to get involved in a church somehow, and they'll help them turn their lives around.” The Rev. Mary Moreno Richardson, an Episcopal priest in San Diego who has publicly opposed the trafficking and sexual exploitation of women, said the department's decision to publish pictures of female offenders appeared to be selectively punishing them without trying to solve the problem.

“This story is as old as time,” Richardson said. “I think they should offer solutions and services to these women, who have already completed their sentences and paid for these crimes.”

Councilman Gary Kendrick sees it as a deterrent.

“I think someone is less likely to engage in prostitution in El Cajon if they know their picture is going to end up on our Web site,” he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: blotter; crime; hookers; privacy; prostitution; publicmorals; skanks; trickortreat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: DogByte6RER

“Prostitutes’ Photos, Case Details, Phone numbers Put Online (...)”


81 posted on 10/30/2007 3:53:43 PM PDT by Erasmus (My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Apparently they think they're not gonna catch the c.l.a.p.

But getting razzed by their co-workers or - shudder - their wives/sig others might just get the point across.

82 posted on 10/30/2007 3:53:44 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: boleslaus sabakovic

On the other hand, I think she has potential.


83 posted on 10/30/2007 3:59:18 PM PDT by Erasmus (My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
The problem is no one ever thinks they are going to get caught.

Or as a former Commandant of The Marine Corps so eloquently put it: "It's not the fear of punishment that keeps Marines in line, it's the certainty"...

84 posted on 10/30/2007 4:00:52 PM PDT by null and void (Franz Kafka would have killed himself in despair if he lived in the world we inhabit today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Cynthia McKinney's long-lost cousin, perhaps? Or maybe Buckwheat's?

From the Van Der Graaff Hall of Fame at Univ. of Wisconsin:


85 posted on 10/30/2007 4:41:15 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

For them to be able to ply their trade, people already HAVE to know they’re prostitutes, so how is this a disincentive for them? Now, put up pictures of the johns and that would be a different story.


86 posted on 02/25/2008 7:55:05 AM PST by Still Thinking (This reply formatted with BBCodeXtra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
That kind of blows their undercover gals.

Unless they were smart and put a couple of them in.

87 posted on 02/25/2008 8:01:58 AM PST by Still Thinking (This reply formatted with BBCodeXtra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Giggle


88 posted on 02/25/2008 9:56:24 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson