Here it is. They vote on Wednesday.
Will our country be regulated to the trash bin of history?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
But now we find out that it's worse than we thought. The State Department had previously submitted another treaty that specifically and explicitly defined a land-based source of pollution as being a toilet bowl. Ratification of this treaty, in conjunction with ratification of UNCLOS, would literally invite U.N. inspectors to review and manage discharge from your toilet bowl. Why didn't Bellinger tell the Senate about that during his UNCLOS testimony?
2 posted on
10/29/2007 8:14:07 PM PDT by
processing please hold
(Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
To: processing please hold
If George Bush and the United Nations have anything to do about it, yes.
3 posted on
10/29/2007 8:17:09 PM PDT by
Grunthor
(Christmas is a time when people of all religions come together to worship Jesus Christ.)
To: processing please hold
It is amazing but true. The Bush Administration wants the Senate to ratify a treaty that will invite international inspections of what you flush down your toilet.
Are they going to wait till I'm off the pot?
4 posted on
10/29/2007 8:18:06 PM PDT by
gitmo
(From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
To: processing please hold
As I said in 2004
The big issue with LOST isn't about the ocean; it's about land use control. This global bureaucracy will justify control of land use to "protect" the marine environment. It isn't hard to see. Many oceanic species breed in estuaries within the United States. Estuarine health isn't doing very well for a number of reasons (many of which politicized science will conveniently miss). The estuaries are fed by rivers. The rivers are lined with cities.
Marine sanctuaries and global biospheres are model for what is planned for LOST. If all we accomplish is to alter the treaty to gain protection for our military, we will have missed the point.
LOST is a straitjacket fully capable of crippling this nation (which certainly affects its ability to defend itself). That the White House says it knows nothing about it belies the fact that, according to the email I get from ALRA, the White House and Chuck Hagel are the instigators in pushing this treaty through in the dark of night after the Reagan Administration had rejected it out of hand.
This is what the UN wants for us:
![](http://www.easynewyorkcity.com/ungun.jpg)
This is what I want for them:
![](http://www.joebrower.com/PHILE_PILE/PIX/UN/UN_helmet-small.jpg)
9 posted on
10/29/2007 8:34:57 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: processing please hold
...and people still don’t want to believe in the NWO agenda...
God Help Us
10 posted on
10/29/2007 8:41:26 PM PDT by
Halgr
(Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
To: processing please hold
13 posted on
10/29/2007 8:44:02 PM PDT by
Brad’s Gramma
(Mother of the Bride here, treat me with respect for once, will ya? ;))
To: processing please hold
The reasons to oppose GWB never seem to end. But what happens on Jan. 20, 2009? I think a certain person is already measuring the drapes, to use the old cliche.
21 posted on
10/29/2007 9:04:12 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
( Cowardice is still forever!)
To: processing please hold
Trying to ram as many of these through so the incoming pres won’t have to take the rap for them.
To: processing please hold
Will our country be regulated to the trash bin of history? With BS like this treaty and illegal aliens running wild, we are, IMHO, well on our way.
36 posted on
10/29/2007 10:05:42 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery! She will redefine "How bad can it get?")
To: processing please hold; All
GIT ON THE DAMN PHONEZZZZZZ !!!
![Image and video hosting by TinyPic](http://i20.tinypic.com/b666ap.jpg)
AT DAY~LIGHT IZZZ BEST!!!!
42 posted on
10/29/2007 10:29:16 PM PDT by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
To: processing please hold
This could turn out to be the worst thing Bush has advocated.
Would someone please talk some sense into this man.
Heaven help us if he signs away our sovereignty on this issue.
43 posted on
10/29/2007 10:29:40 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(We yen to be numba one. We find Crintons to be vewy good people. Worth every penny.)
To: processing please hold; Congressman Billybob; Buckhead; Nick Danger; Alamo-Girl; The Shrew; ...
50 posted on
10/29/2007 10:56:39 PM PDT by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: processing please hold
OMG. I’ve got a few hours left on my cell phone. It’s going to be very busy tomorrow.
Anyone want to post this on the thread “A day in the life.............(of you-know-who)?”
67 posted on
10/29/2007 11:57:48 PM PDT by
yorkie
To: processing please hold
I think this would give us another tool to use against countries who put terror and weapons ahead of people management
I would put the USA waste program way ahead of of other countries / continents including Europe
69 posted on
10/30/2007 2:10:56 AM PDT by
sure_fine
(• " not one to over kill the thought process " •)
To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; ...
70 posted on
10/30/2007 2:14:23 AM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
To: processing please hold
international obligations
Both major parties seem to be headed to a One World Government.
Both major parties seem to be headed toward socialism.
I'm no conspiracy buff, but do our Party leaders know something we don't? They act like it.
![Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v404/RGScott/enterprise.jpg)
After all, they know we cant joint the Federation of Planets until we have a One World Government. Do our esteemed leaders really watch too much TV?
72 posted on
10/30/2007 3:02:54 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: processing please hold
"Foreign judges and lawyers could easily interpret greenhouse gas emissions as contributing to pollution of the oceans."
'Foreign' my @ss! Right here!
74 posted on
10/30/2007 3:41:24 AM PDT by
moonman
To: processing please hold
In my mind, the single most unacceptable provision of the treaty is that it gives the UN the power to tax.
The UN is far too unaccountable am organization for it to be allowed its own indepedent sources of funding.
76 posted on
10/30/2007 4:52:21 AM PDT by
jdege
To: processing please hold
It just means our nation will go straight down the crapper.
78 posted on
10/30/2007 4:55:05 AM PDT by
punster
To: AliVeritas; holdonnow
79 posted on
10/30/2007 5:04:08 AM PDT by
sono
(Remember when Health Insurance was a Carry Permit?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson