Makes no sense really, but...
It is irrelevant whether he is at 1% or 5%, until you guys solve the riddle of why he has not moved much despite being in the race for months and being the “ideal” conservative, nothing will come of it. You have to win the vote of a wide variety of people in the Republican camp. You have to stand out.
Ironic, the very guy who has a shot and represents more of Hunters ideals than anyone else is the guy you guys are hitting the most it seems.
***You mean, like trying to knock him down? Not even close. My post was pointing out simple facts from the same unbiased type of sources that I’m promoting in this thread.
Yet in this very thread I see more folks lamenting a Rudy or Romney win.
***Oh, well. You might want to take it up with those who lament.
It is irrelevant whether he is at 1% or 5%,
***Thanks! I’ve been wondering when the bar would be raised. When he gets to 5%, the bar will be 10%. When he gets to 10% it will be 30%. We’re pushing the candidate who would make the best president, thank you, and we don’t care that much about polls that are biased.
until you guys solve the riddle of why he has not moved much despite being in the race for months and being the ideal conservative, nothing will come of it.
***He is moving. This thread is evidence of it.
You have to win the vote of a wide variety of people in the Republican camp. You have to stand out.
***When there is a vote, we hope to win it. Until then, all these biased polls don’t mean much to us. We’re not even yet in the PRIMARIES. I think we can see some real results in the numbers at Intrade and it explains why Fred Followers have been bashing Hunter threads — they’re more afraid of him than the supposed 1% represents. I was never afraid of Tommy Thompson, never even once bothered to log onto one of his threads. Why? Because he really was a 1%er.
So, if Hunter really is a 1%er, go ahead and buy his futures at 1% and I’ll buy them from you at 1.1% to guarantee you a 10% rate of return in ONE DAY. But you can’t get Hunter at 1%.