Yes, king and queen are gender specific and the is perhaps why the school named each of the students a “Prince.”
However, I still do not see anything sexual about that role of homecoming king and queen or prince and prince etc.
Furthermore, people are making the assumption that just because it is a gay couple that was elected that the two must be sexually active.
That being the case, are we to assume that all straight couples that are elected homecoming king and queen are also sexually active?
Don't you find that appalling, and insulting to the girls at that school? Should guys be allowed to enter beauty pageants, or show up as cheerleaders wearing the girls' uniforms? Why does every wholesome thing have to be wrecked to gratify these weirdos?
Apples and oranges.
Straight couples are, on the face of it, exhibiting normal, healthy relationships, and until fairly recently teenagers were at least expected to conform to societal restraints.
Homosexual couples, on the other hand, are exhibiting abnormal, unhealthy, deviant, disturbed behavior, and, since their very relationship is in defiance of societal taboo, societal restraints are less than even a minor inconvenience to them. Perverted sexual congress is implicit in their declaration of poofterhood.
Okay, how did a guy get nominated for Queen? That’s gender specific. He wasn’t even eligible. This is now obviously sexual in nature rather than just about electing a King and Queen - they were elected as a gay couple, not as two students winning the respective titles for their homecoming. Are you really unable to see the very clear distinction here? Think, please.
Two “Kings” would be semantically equivalent, but there’s no historic precedent for that, which I am aware of.