Skip to comments.
Giuliani is GOP's best shot against Hillary, said Ford
NY Daily News ^
Posted on 10/28/2007 8:37:21 AM PDT by Sadecki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
1
posted on
10/28/2007 8:37:22 AM PDT
by
Sadecki
To: Sadecki
That makes sense, Jerry Ford was a RINO, may he rest in peace.
2
posted on
10/28/2007 8:39:46 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: Sadecki
Wow. An endorsement from the grave. From one of the biggest RINOs ever.
Sorry Rudy. Jerry’s now voting Democrat in Michigan...
3
posted on
10/28/2007 8:40:27 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(With "Republicans" like this, who needs Democrats?)
To: Sadecki
he's just a leader." Yup, down the path of liberalism and to the destruction of the GOP. He leads, we bleed, liberalism succeeds...NO THANKS!
4
posted on
10/28/2007 8:40:51 AM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
(He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
To: Sadecki
Everyone is wrong sometimes.
5
posted on
10/28/2007 8:43:00 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Sadecki
"Well, if they want to win, Giuliani. He's really good, he's articulate ............I'm confused. I thought Obama was the "articulate" candidate.
6
posted on
10/28/2007 8:43:07 AM PDT
by
umgud
(Axis of Propaganda; lib academia, lib media, lib entertainment)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If I knew nothing else about Rudy, this story would be enough to convince me that he is the last person Republicans should nominate. Has there ever been a major American politician with worse political judgment than Gerald Ford?
Ford won the nomination in 1976 telling Republicans that Ronald Reagan was too extreme. He said then that he was the only hope for keeping the White House in GOP hands.
His strategy failed then and it would fail now.
7
posted on
10/28/2007 8:43:27 AM PDT
by
fluffdaddy
(we don't need no stinking taglines)
To: Sadecki
President Ford was the last pro-abortion GOP president this country had.
Let's not go back there.
8
posted on
10/28/2007 8:44:09 AM PDT
by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: Sadecki
Ford was 92 when he said this and yes he was a RINO, but as RINOs go he was one of the better ones. I think he tried to do a good job as prez, but the forces of treason were strongly aligned against him and the job of dealing with them was obviously bigger than he could handle.
9
posted on
10/28/2007 8:44:42 AM PDT
by
samtheman
To: Sadecki
Is anyone surprised by this? Ford was part of the old Rockefeller wing of the GOP.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
11
posted on
10/28/2007 8:46:36 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: fluffdaddy
This guy annoyed me when he was alive, and I still can’t get any peace from him after he’s gone.
12
posted on
10/28/2007 8:46:39 AM PDT
by
jpl
(Dear Al Gore: it's 3:00 A.M., do you know where your drug addicted son is?)
To: Sadecki
How many presidential elections is Ford win again? lol
To: Sadecki
To: Sadecki
ok. let's go over it again, so the we understand what the man said. he said, "Well, if they want to win, Giuliani. He's really good, he's articulate - he's just a leader."
He did not say that FReepers would like him. He did say that, if the GOP wants to win, Rudy has the best shot making that happen.
He did not say Rudy was the next Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan, or anyone else. He did admire Rudy's charisma.
Now, whether you like Rudy or not, he is the only candidate currently announced who is capable of defeating X42's spouse. That doesn't mean you have to like him. But it is a practical and political reality.
So, slandering Gerald Ford is juvenile way of disagreeing with his point.
Let's see, can we get a measure of Latino slander in here while we're at it?
To: Sadecki
Who’s Jerry ford and why should I care?
16
posted on
10/28/2007 8:51:55 AM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: Sadecki
If after the primary it was Rudy or Hitlery, we would pick the lesser of two evils and vote for Rudy.
17
posted on
10/28/2007 8:52:18 AM PDT
by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: elizabetty
“...last pro abortion...”
Exactly, Jules represents the NE Business/pro abortion segment of the GOP.
Folks like President Ford thought that Abortion was a great social experiment, like a new paint scheme was suddenly available for new automobiles.
They could not have been more wrong in view of the carnage that has be inflicted on Life in this country.
I never thought I would see the day were “Channeling” became a part of the discussion in the GOP.
18
posted on
10/28/2007 8:53:04 AM PDT
by
padre35
(Conservative in Exile/ No more miller brewing products, pass it on/Isaiah 3.3)
To: Sadecki
Sheesh, now the dead guys are pushing Rudy! Give us a break!
I’m waiting for some long lost correspondence from Ronald Reagan promoting FRed as his successor, anyone got it lying around? ;-)
19
posted on
10/28/2007 8:53:11 AM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud RUSH REPUBLICAN! WIN, FRED, WIN!!!)
To: the invisib1e hand
Now, whether you like Rudy or not, he is the only candidate currently announced who is capable of defeating X42's spouse. That doesn't mean you have to like him. But it is a practical and political reality. An opinion stated as fact.
20
posted on
10/28/2007 8:54:14 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(With "Republicans" like this, who needs Democrats?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-217 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson