A pro-illegals nominee ? Fuhgeddaboutit.
Ditto...that’s what 3rd parties and write-ins are all about. You don’t vote for the lesser of two evils. You don’t vote for compromised principles or a compromised party.
you people that advocate NOT voting if your R candidate doesn’t win the primary is nuts, pure and simple. Oh, and highly selfish.
That you would find it acceptable that the evil clinton be in the White House because your wittle candidate didn’t win is bullshit.
There. I said it.
You’re as bad as the left if that’s what you do when we get down to the wire.
Huckabee has dropped his past support for illegal aliens and has now come out AGAINST the Senate amnesty proposal and supported a fence. Is that a flip-flop? Yep. And your guy Fred has done exactly the same thing. Until 2007, Fred favored giving "aspirations of citizenship" to illegals and voted for one of the 90s era mini-amnesties to legalize nearly one million illegal aliens when he was in the Senate.
Obviously, if Huckabee's "past record" on illegal aliens makes him unacceptable, the fact Fred voted against common sense immigration to crack down on illegals and favored "aspiriations of citizenship" for them(ultimately earning a lifetime "D" rating on "Preventing Illegal Alien Amnesties) means we should vote "third party" if he's the nominee.
Oh, I forgot. Your "deal breaker" issues don't apply to Fred.