No problem. When you look up his "record" and discover Fred signed a Tenneeseeans for Choice questionaire saying he was OKAY with the status quo from Roe v. Wade, and when Fred refuses to support a marriage protection amendment, you guys can't use that excuse either. You thought of a much better one. Why, he just being a good "federalist" by refusing to combat abortion and the gay agenda! And all good "federalists" know its up to the states to take care of hot button issues like that (worked wonders during the slavery crisis in the 1850s, didn't it?)
If only Harriet Miers had thought of that one. "I just being a good federalist when I signed that stuff!" Coulda made it onto the Supreme Court.
Tsk, tsk.
Billy, I find it remarkable that you manage to defend some of the most odious RINOs out there while you take swipes at good candidates like Fred. If Fred was so pro-abort and pro-gay, why does his voting record indicate the opposite ? Similarly, why do you then take the word of Precious Willard and Huckabee whose records are clearly dreadful and then “all of a sudden” they now start to take an opposite stance when running for President — mere months after exiting their Gubernatorial jobs ? How convenient. Fred never changed his basic core values. He doesn’t need to be President. But for politicians like Huckabee and Rudy and Precious Willard... they do need it. It’s all they have now. It’s precisely why they should never attain it, and why Fred should.