To: rb22982
Why 5% of FR spends so much time focusing on someone polling at 1-2% in Republican primaries is seriously hilarious--and tragic at the same time. You and a couple others on here seriously spend more time fighting against Ron Paul -- with .1% chance of being elected -- than fighting Hillary with probably 55% chance of being elected or Obama with 10% chance of being elected.Because while this is a yawn to you, this will be of interest to the media.
Medved hit it today.
When they NY Times and Washington Post get on board, they'll be connecting this to Republicans, not Paul.
15 posted on
10/25/2007 5:39:09 PM PDT by
SJackson
(every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
To: SJackson
The louder they squeal, SJ. The louder they squeal. ;)
20 posted on
10/25/2007 5:46:43 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
To: SJackson
When they NY Times and Washington Post get on board, they'll be connecting this to Republicans, not Paul. I don't think they'll waste their time. Why would they? Even non-Republicans will smell the BS about tying Republicans to white supremacists or racists. They've heard this song-and-dance every election. It definetly won't hurt Paul because he's already marginalized by both the MSM and mainstream conservatives anyway.
28 posted on
10/25/2007 5:59:42 PM PDT by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
("Just 3 hours a day with Rudy Guiliani is all I ask" -- Sean Hannity is on! Thank you Scott Shannon!)
To: SJackson
Ridiculously speculative.
31 posted on
10/25/2007 6:04:25 PM PDT by
rb22982
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson