Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: SPECIFIC CONTRIBUTION BY LEADING NEO-NAZI TO RON PAUL CAMPAIGN IDENTIFIED
Lone Star Times ^ | 10-25-07

Posted on 10/25/2007 5:18:22 PM PDT by SJackson

EXCLUSIVE: SPECIFIC CONTRIBUTION BY LEADING NEO-NAZI TO RON PAUL CAMPAIGN IDENTIFIED

by LST Staff | 10/25/2007 4:59 pm | Alert moderator

 

LONESTARTIMES.COM EXCLUSIVE!!!

Must credit LoneStarTimes.com!!!

That means YOU, mainstream media producer/reporter/outlet!

————————-

A LoneStarTimes.com investigation has conclusively established that a leading figure in the American neo-Nazi / White-Supremacist movement has provided financial support to Ron Paul’s 2008 Presidential campaign.

The individual in question is Don Black, the founder, owner and operator of Stormfront, a “white power” website that both professional journalists and watch-dog groups have identified as the premier English-language racist/hate-site on the Internet.

Previous LST posts have focused on banner “widgets” appearing on the front-page of Stormfront. It is important to emphasize that these are NOT “advertisements” placed on Stormfront BY the Paul campaign, but rather publicly-available graphics that Stormfront’s owner has chosen to place himself, with links directly to Paul’s donation page.

Nevertheless, LST has in the past several weeks raised a series of questions for the Paul campaign; specifically–

1.       Can Paul confirm that the donation widgets appearing on Stormfront are the result of the site owner’s actions, not the campaign’s?

2.       Will Paul take measures to block Stormfront as a referring URL to his own website, so that no future donations can possibly flow into his campaign from a site that serves as the on-line nexus of neo-Nazism?

3.       Will Paul ask his own web-staff to trace past donations that were made by anyone arriving at his campaign’s webpage from Stormfront, so that these contributions can be rejected?

4.       Will Paul explore if there are any legal actions available to try to remove his donation widget from Stormfront, and if so pursue them?

5.       At the very least, will Paul personally state publicly, vigorously and unmistakably that he rejects the support of white supremacists, and that he will not knowingly tolerate their involvement with his campaign in any form or to any degree?

LoneStarTimes.com’s managing editor Matt Bramanti left multiple messages last week for officials in Paul’s national campaign press office seeking comment. None were returned.

In the interim, a number of grassroots supporters of Paul’s campaign– including many honorable and regular readers of LST– have argued that…

These abstract debates are now moot– a contribution to the Paul campaign by a known white-supremacist has been identified.

The evidence is as follows:

In light of these facts, we believe our previously asked questions continue to have merit.

A final note– it is traditional in political campaigns for candidates to return contributions from “toxic” donors once sufficient public scrutiny and outcry has been generated.

The difficulty in this instance is that if Ron Paul returns these funds to Mr. Black, all he will have done is given a neo-Nazi $500 more dollars with which to spread his psychotic bile.

We would therefore like to suggest that the Ron Paul campaign donate Black’s $500 to any of the following worthy recipients–

We try to be helpful.

Matt Bramanti, Managing Editor (Gentile Stooge)
David Benzion, Publisher (Z.O.G. Chapter #1948 President)
LoneStarTimes.com

NOTE: For interview requests, contact us at “lsteditors

 


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: donblack; donors; elections; groupiesindenial; paulestinians; ronpaul; ronpaulsfourthreich; thecompanyhekeeps; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: rb22982
Why 5% of FR spends so much time focusing on someone polling at 1-2% in Republican primaries is seriously hilarious

Why spend 10.00 on HBO? Why spend 50.00 on tickets for a comedy tour?

Entertainment.

41 posted on 10/25/2007 6:11:38 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (265 pound Lemming with attitude for Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

Nope, most of the same people have been doing this since long before Ron Paul was against Iraq. There are about 5% of FR that think libertarians—with 0-2% national vote—are more of a concern than Democrats with 45-55% of the national vote depending on the year. This is a serious waste of time.


42 posted on 10/25/2007 6:11:56 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“And yes, he must disavow this support, else risk condemnation from other Republicans.”

Why is it a crime for him to accept money from these people but the Dims can accept money from the LaRaza groups and you don’t complain? La Raza has some extremely antisemetic comments on some of their websites.
Like this one:
http://aztlan.net/index.html


43 posted on 10/25/2007 6:12:24 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KylaStarr; Cindy; StillProud2BeFree; nw_arizona_granny; Velveeta; Dolphy; appalachian_dweller; ...

reference ping


44 posted on 10/25/2007 6:13:07 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

The people who post against Ron Paul more than anything else are not in it for entertainment.


45 posted on 10/25/2007 6:13:11 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FreeInWV
I don’t recall you asking the MainStreet Republicans to return George Soros’ money.

I haven't, nor do I have a clue who the Main Street Republicans are.

Is one of them running for President?

I presume you're OK with these associations.

46 posted on 10/25/2007 6:13:14 PM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: antisocial
I've posted many times about LaRaza, I'm quite familiar with Aztlan.net

It's not a crime, it's stupid.

And since you advocate neonazi support for Paul, you're in no position at all to criticize anyone from taking money from LaRaza.

47 posted on 10/25/2007 6:16:02 PM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rb22982; ejonesie22
The people who post against Ron Paul more than anything else are not in it for entertainment.

ejonesie22, it's a conspiracy, this is a Ron Paul thread after all.

Some of Paul's critics were planted here years ago, in anticipation of his "successful" 2007 campaign.

48 posted on 10/25/2007 6:17:49 PM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
For someone who's irrelevant, you sure do waste a lot of time on him.

How about just letting Paul implode in the primaries then? His situation of possibly being tied with white supremacists is an internal campaign matter. How is it affecting the other Republican candidates knowing that their beliefs and goals are at least 180 degrees from Paul's? Obviously, you're panicking over the prospect of the GOP being tied into this and affecting whichever Republican is nominated.

If Paul is the whack-job that many say he is, then no reasonable conservative or small-l Libertarian is going to support him, he'll implode and the anti-war kooks/white supremacists who supposedly make up a large percentage of his campaign will shrug their shoulders and vote their usual 3rd party then.

49 posted on 10/25/2007 6:20:35 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("Just 3 hours a day with Rudy Guiliani is all I ask" -- Sean Hannity is on! Thank you Scott Shannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; ejonesie22

It’s not a conspiracy. There are 1-2% of Republicans who actually feel more threatened by a libertarian with 1% national vote and probably only 10% national ID recognition than a Democrats and outright admitted socialists. I don’t understand it, but hey, people like you I guess must exist in a society this large. To me, the single largest issue in the next election is preventing hillary care. The second biggest issue is stopping the upcoming tax increases that could kill the economy. The third is staying the course in Iraq. To people like you, Sjackson, the most important issue is going after someone with 1% of the vote and .01% chance to be elected president. To each their own I guess.


50 posted on 10/25/2007 6:21:20 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

>> With Ron Paul, several freepers on here seriously get to the point where they act like liberals (throw away common sense, name call, act hysterically, etc).

I know just what you mean! But enough about RP’s supporters...

>> These people are more scared of Ron Paul than Hillary or Osama...Anyone who fears libertarians more than Democrats &etc

I’m not sure anyone here /fears/ Ron Paul at all, let alone more than Democrats. I think there are a fair number of us (yes, count me as one) who dislike ElRon intensely — almost as much as we dislike Democrats.

>> IMO has no more belonging on this site yadda yadda

??? What part of “opinion forum” is confusing to you? Frankly I’m getting a little tired of all the posters lately evoking the “Ghost of Bill O’Reilly Hit Piece”, suggesting what “is” and “isn’t” proper to post here! If you’re not an admin mod or Jim Robinson, get off that frequency. Please.


51 posted on 10/25/2007 6:21:23 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
It’s why Duncan is my #1. I know he doesn’t stand a great shot in the general which is why I’ll vote for Thompson, or even hold my nose and vote Guiliani.

Are we somehow related? I feel exactly the same way. I'm usually called a political whore for it but as long as it keeps "she who shall not be named" out of the White House I'll take it.

52 posted on 10/25/2007 6:21:54 PM PDT by infidel29 (...no, actually rules are made to be followed, otherwise they'd be called "options".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Sigh. You can waste as much as your time as you like. I generally like Ron Paul's views. I disagree with him 100% on foreign policy. I dislike Bush on a lot of things, including securing our borders and his out of control spending.

With that said, I spend the majority of my time on FR posting about economic issues (as I know Republicans really don't care that much about social issues regardless of lip service) and agree with most FReepers. In my personal life, I never even bring up Ron Paul with friends and co-workers. I spend my time railing against socialism, Democrats, and the liberal media. These are far more important than Ron Paul, libertarian 1-2% like myself, and FR. You and SJackson can think/do as you wish. I prefer better uses of conservative folks time.

53 posted on 10/25/2007 6:26:20 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Goes a LONG way to explaining the Internet Ron Paul Jihad, doesn’t it?


54 posted on 10/25/2007 6:28:54 PM PDT by tcrlaf (You can lead a Liberal to LOGIC, but you can't make it THINK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Add Ace of Spades to the list of conservative bloggers covering this breaking story:

"I don't completely buy that a candidate isn't responsible for his supporters. If a campaign attracts so many malcontents, racists, anti-semites, paranoids, America-haters, conspiracy-mongers, and political pornographers, well, I assume there's a reason for this grand crossing-the-streams of weirdness."

55 posted on 10/25/2007 6:29:08 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
ejonesie22, it's a conspiracy, this is a Ron Paul thread after all.

Funny how most of the Paul threads are posted by the Paul haters.

You guys are just like Redstate. Post the Paul threads but damn if any of the Paul supporters are going to muck up the echo chamber.

56 posted on 10/25/2007 6:30:19 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("Just 3 hours a day with Rudy Guiliani is all I ask" -- Sean Hannity is on! Thank you Scott Shannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: infidel29
I'm usually called a political whore for it but as long as it keeps "she who shall not be named" out of the White House I'll take it.

Agreed.

57 posted on 10/25/2007 6:31:42 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
I think its interesting that so many on the Right and Left believe that if Israel just went away either by force or voluntary, that all our enemies in the ME would leave us alone. Throw down their suicide vests and stop roaming the globe murdering innocents in marketplaces.

Fascinating how the haters of Israel or Jews just will not let it go, generation after generation after generation. RP capitalizes on this, and uses their parlance for fundraising.

It has to be some kind of pathology, or its biblical, lol.

58 posted on 10/25/2007 6:31:58 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Funny, I don’t know anyone on the left or right who thinks that if Israel went away that our enemies in the ME would leave us alone. Second, I don’t see this highlighted by Ron Paul on his website, 99% of his bills presented to congress or in any of his speeches.


59 posted on 10/25/2007 6:33:35 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You guys are just like Redstate. Post the Paul threads but damn if any of the Paul supporters are going to muck up the echo chamber.

We're all crazy.

An non-Paul people are crazy.

I know FR isn't thrilled with Paul supporters, FR wasn't thrilled with Giuliani supporters, but can you point to anything I've said on this thread that makes you think I don't think you should be posting here, the Red State reference.

Or any other thread for that matter.

With the link, for context.

Paul may be an idol to some people, but you need to understand most do consider him a legitimate target for criticism.

60 posted on 10/25/2007 6:34:15 PM PDT by SJackson (every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, none to make him afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson