Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeteB570

Well, its hard to argue no government liability when a state owned bridge collapses... I think its hard to argue the state has no liability in this one... And these families I am sure will eventually get something from the state, the contractors, or insurance companies for them or others. Lets face it, some folks screwed up big time here.

I just don’t understand if you have children in particular how you don’t have life insurance.... Its a very cheap thing, and while it doesn’t replace mommy or daddy coming home every night, it at least ensures your family will not be losing everything should something happen to you.


18 posted on 10/25/2007 1:05:47 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
Accident of fortune. Bridges sometimes collapse. Bringing a claim of negligence against the State for a bridge that had stood for over 40 years would require extra-ordinary proof.

This is just more voting buying and pandering by the DFL.

22 posted on 10/25/2007 1:07:46 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson