Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh Live Radio Thread. 10/25/07
Posted on 10/25/2007 8:30:29 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: limbaugh; megadittos; rush; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-212 next last
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Actually any one of the Canteen thread posters know of FReepers who have family serving.
41
posted on
10/25/2007 9:33:02 AM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(hillery-rotten & her flying-monkeys in 08? OVER MY DEAD BODY, WitCh™!!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
42
posted on
10/25/2007 9:35:24 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW! ®™ ± ‰¢ ©)
To: All
And who helped Rangel cut a deal?
Eliot Spitzer -
The Apollo was the subject of controversy in 1998, when the New York attorney general, Dennis C. Vacco, sued the theater and six members of its foundation board - including Representative Charles B. Rangel, the Harlem congressman who was then the board's chairman - and accused them of mismanaging the Apollo's finances. Although Mr. Rangel denied wrongdoing, he resigned as chairman and later agreed to leave the board as part of a settlement with Mr. Vacco's successor, Eliot L. Spitzer.
43
posted on
10/25/2007 9:39:01 AM PDT
by
sono
(Remember when Health Insurance was a Carry Permit?)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Rush, if you are lurking, here is a reply from one of my stupendous Senators: (just thought I would share with the rest of my Freeper buddies)
Dear Kerretarded:
Thank you for contacting me regarding recent actions taken by members of the Senate in response to comments made by radio personality Rush Limbaugh.
Mr. Limbaughs comments made on September 26, 2007 implied certain members of the military were less patriotic than others. I have received numerous letters in the last few weeks expressing outrage at inflammatory remarks made by policymakers, political groups, radio personalities, and celebrities. The individuals and groups that are the focus of these letters either made a controversial statement about a member of the military, or responded in a controversial manner to such statements.
The common thread in these letters is a view I share: addressing concrete issues is far more productive than debating the appropriateness of comments protected by the first amendment. However, I do think that the vigorous debate over the MoveOn.org ad and Rush Limbaughs comments have served one important purpose: it has reminded this nation that while Rush Limbaugh, MoveOn.org, the Swiftboat Veterans, and any other group or individual has the First amendment right to free speech, personal attacks on past or present members of the military are offensive and counterproductive. I supported an amendment to the Defense Authorization Act that reflected this basic premise, and I signed a letter to the sponsor of Rush Limbaughs radio program, Clear Channel, that made the same point.
Regardless of the source and the motivation, vitriolic attacks on members of the military deflect attention from the pressing issues upon which our nation should be focused, including the need to ensure our troops are properly equipped, receive the benefits they deserve, and are redeployed as soon as possible.
Thank you again for contacting me.
Sincerely,
Sherrod Brown
Obviously, this man was a graduate from our government schools because he has a problem with reading and comprehension. First, this "senator" still believes that Rush was talking about ACTUAL soldiers. He parrots the talking point that attacks such as the one that Rush didn't do are offensive to current and former soldiers. Second, I didn't see Sherrod Brown go to the floor of the Senate to censure Pete Stark. I can't find where Sherrod Brown has signed a letter which was sent to Pete Stark for making ACTUAL offensive comments. Third, he views it as an attack on the same level as the MoveOn "Betray-Us" ad. And finally, when Sherrod Brown decided to include the Swiftboat Veterans in this response, he forgot to mention one more individual who made offensive comments: JOHN KERRY!!!!
44
posted on
10/25/2007 9:40:08 AM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
(It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it- Aristotle)
To: Clint N. Suhks; Bahbah; Fudd Fan; AGreatPer; American Quilter; Joisey; DoughtyOne
Thanks, everyone. I’ll keep you all posted.
45
posted on
10/25/2007 9:43:07 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(When gov't wants to fix something, chances are it was the gov't that broke it in the first place.)
To: All
I hope Rush talks about this moonbat, witch, commie pinko getting in Condi's face!
46
posted on
10/25/2007 9:45:26 AM PDT
by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: Kerretarded; holdonnow
Perhaps a “Surge” would encourage Mr. Brown to actually check primary sources instead of relying on Dingy Harry’s and Media Matters’ talking points before committing himself in writing. This guy’s a buffoon on so many levels.
47
posted on
10/25/2007 9:45:44 AM PDT
by
sono
(Remember when Health Insurance was a Carry Permit?)
To: A.Hun
I wish Condi had simply tweaked Madam Bozo’s nose.
48
posted on
10/25/2007 9:46:48 AM PDT
by
sono
(Remember when Health Insurance was a Carry Permit?)
To: A.Hun
Disgusting. How did this loon get so close to Condoleeza?
49
posted on
10/25/2007 9:47:27 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(When gov't wants to fix something, chances are it was the gov't that broke it in the first place.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Good question RWI...no one has said. She was probably invited to the House hearing by a Dem.
51
posted on
10/25/2007 9:48:35 AM PDT
by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Disgusting. How did this loon get so close to Condoleeza?Don't forget Bush's new tone! We can't offend anyone by keeping them away! That wouldn't be fair!
To: rightwingintelligentsia
53
posted on
10/25/2007 9:49:46 AM PDT
by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: A.Hun
I hope Rush talks about this moonbat, witch, commie pinko getting in Condi's face! Scary. That lunatic could have seriously hurt Condi. There is no excuse for that to happen. Someone's head needs to roll. Dems are despicable, because they keep allowing this to happen.
54
posted on
10/25/2007 9:50:52 AM PDT
by
MaestroLC
("Let him who wants peace prepare for war."--Vegetius, A.D. Fourth Century)
To: MarkLevinFan
So it’s George Bush’s fault?
55
posted on
10/25/2007 9:51:24 AM PDT
by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: MarkLevinFan
56
posted on
10/25/2007 9:52:58 AM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(When gov't wants to fix something, chances are it was the gov't that broke it in the first place.)
To: A.Hun
Gotta love the code pinkows
They put the fun in moonbattery.
57
posted on
10/25/2007 9:54:00 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW! ®™ ± ‰¢ ©)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Since Mother Shehag is now a non-person, they have to generate some publicity somehow.
58
posted on
10/25/2007 9:55:47 AM PDT
by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: MaestroLC
The Dem leadership knew ahead of time that woman would do what she did when Condi showed up.
59
posted on
10/25/2007 9:55:50 AM PDT
by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: MaestroLC; All
Ok, which one of you VRWC guards let that lunatic out of the psych ward?
60
posted on
10/25/2007 9:56:40 AM PDT
by
darkangel82
(And the band played on....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-212 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson