[SampleMan]

If not a choice, then it is a birth defect, correct? These people want it to be observed as a choice, but not admit its a choice. If you have any doubt about that, just refer to the idea of curing homosexuality.

If a shot became available tomorrow that prevented infants from developing into homosexuals, you can bet that the libs would seek to make administering it illegal.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

Actually, they want it classified as part of their DNA makeup (thus the bogus search for a “gay gene”) or of it being some condition they cannot overcome.

Why?

ADA protection and other civil-rights protections.

It is a lifestyle, a preference, like preferring one type of mate to another, though you could get by with most, and therefore deserving of no protection.

That’s the angle we need to push to protect the traditional, Biblical definition of family

[MrB]

What about aborting based on a gene test showing tendencies toward homosexuality -

their heads would explode.