Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rick.Donaldson

well, republicans don’t seem to be doing much to reduce it, we had control of both houses and the presidency and we grew it like never before. And from the sounds of the presidential debates it doesn’t sound like the other hopefuls would do much to reduce it either.


57 posted on 10/24/2007 12:55:37 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: traviskicks
****well, republicans don’t seem to be doing much to reduce it, we had control of both houses and the presidency and we grew it like never before. And from the sounds of the presidential debates it doesn’t sound like the other hopefuls would do much to reduce it either.*****

There was a link on Drudge earlier today about Bush being a bigger spender than LBJ.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/20767.html

“””That tops the 4.6 percent annual rate Johnson logged during his 1963-69 presidency. By these standards, Ronald Reagan was a tightwad; discretionary spending grew by only 1.9 percent a year on his watch.””””

98 posted on 10/24/2007 2:18:52 PM PDT by jmeagan (Our last chance to change the direction of the country -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson