Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush On MSNBC's Morning Show (Plus Hilarious Exchange Between Rush And Erin Burnett Alert)
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | 10/23/2007 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 10/23/2007 4:44:17 PM PDT by goldstategop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: goldstategop

Rush seems to be saying he’ll vote for whomever the nominee is.

If Rush votes for Rudy, then Rush believes in Party above Principle.


21 posted on 10/23/2007 7:45:48 PM PDT by xzins (If you will just agree to the murdering of your children, we can win the presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwoSue

Either way he had a pretty girl by his side. She was one of the first pretty infobabes IIRC. I remember early on when she was with CNN I used to think she was the cat's meow. She has aged pretty well.

22 posted on 10/23/2007 7:55:24 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

And W is not going to be on the ballot so that is why Rush and other Talk Radio hosts do not think Her Highness is a sure bet. Pubs could even surprise in House races if not the Senate. 17 seats are the difference in the House.


23 posted on 10/23/2007 7:56:56 PM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I remember that, I felt embarrassed for her, with Chris being his male chauvinistic self
24 posted on 10/23/2007 7:56:56 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: aflaak

ping


25 posted on 10/23/2007 8:07:44 PM PDT by r-q-tek86 (rich, berserker, shield biting, mushroom eating, soccer ignoring business owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“If Rush votes for Rudy, then Rush believes in Party above Principle.”

No. He just will do whatever it takes to help keep Hillary out.


26 posted on 10/23/2007 8:12:32 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

That’s called Party above Principle.

Let’s say that we ran Ralph Nader as a republican.

Would we vote to keep Hillary out?

We could probably win against Hillary if we ran Oprah. We can tell her that she can believe anything she wants...we don’t care.

Is that ok?


27 posted on 10/23/2007 8:15:18 PM PDT by xzins (If you will just agree to the murdering of your children, we can win the presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...

“RUSH: Now, I will end up supporting whoever the nominee is, but I don’t want conservatism to be redefined in the process.”


28 posted on 10/23/2007 8:31:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, October 22, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Nice.


29 posted on 10/23/2007 10:23:01 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks.


30 posted on 10/23/2007 10:24:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Erin Burnett images:
Google

31 posted on 10/23/2007 10:50:26 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, October 22, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Rush just hung the failure of the republican party on GWB.

You are correct sir!

The problem the Republicans had, Joe, is that you had President Bush in the White House who was the author of that spending. If you're John Boehner, if you're Denny Hastert, if you're the Senate minority leader, majority leader, in many cases you can't go against your own president. You can't go against "No Child Left Behind." You can't go against letting Ted Kennedy write the education bill. The president sort of hamstrung them on this. .

I give Bush credit for tax cuts and judges (Harriet mired excepted of course) but otherwise his domeistic programs suck bigtime: immigration, no child left behind, medicare perscription drug plan, etc.

32 posted on 10/23/2007 11:16:28 PM PDT by Maynerd (Hillary = amnesty, higher taxes,defeat in the WOT, and socialized medicine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins
If Rush votes for Rudy, then Rush believes in Party above Principle.

Purity in action is for monks, nuns, and eggheads. Life is full of compromises. I'll choose the half loaf of Giuliani over the poisonious brew of President Hillary any day.

33 posted on 10/23/2007 11:21:15 PM PDT by Maynerd (Hillary = amnesty, higher taxes,defeat in the WOT, and socialized medicine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

lol


34 posted on 10/23/2007 11:22:42 PM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: airborne
I get the impression that Rush is done with marriage.

I think Rush would prefer to lease rather than buy and hold.

35 posted on 10/23/2007 11:22:44 PM PDT by Maynerd (Hillary = amnesty, higher taxes,defeat in the WOT, and socialized medicine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd; P-Marlowe
half-loaf of Rudy

You are wrong. Rudy is not any part of a loaf.

He is anti-gun.

He is pro-illegal immigration and amnesty.

He is anti-life.

He is pro-gay union

He is anti-family

He believes in federal funding of abortion

He raised taxes.

He appointed liberal judges

He supported the NY dem candidate over the republican

He harbors a known male homosexual child molester on his staff AND he has wildly participated in gay parades, cross-dressing, etc.

He pushed Kerik, known philander and organized crime connections.

He cruelly dumped wives and children, publicly humiliating them. (IF that's what 'loyalty to commitment' means to the man, then how loyal will he be to his 'political marriage partners,' the conservatives?)

It just goes on and on. There is no loaf there at all.

He is every bit as evil as Hillary.

36 posted on 10/24/2007 4:07:22 AM PDT by xzins (If you will just agree to the murdering of your children, we can win the presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

And did it very succinctly.


37 posted on 10/24/2007 4:15:47 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
You know, despite the advances of feminism in this country, there's still an axiom: "You can't hit the girl,"

Rush, that's all todays feminism is, "You can't hit the girl, but she can hit you." Women have more rights than anyone, except Muslims. Come to think of it, that's what each of the civil rights organizations are about, putting their own group ahead of all of the others in terms of rights.

38 posted on 10/24/2007 4:25:41 AM PDT by magslinger (I will not submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
You are wrong. Rudy is not any part of a loaf.

Actually, he is on one issue.

Rudy, unlike Hillary, would do what's needed to stop terrorism attacks in this country. He has a history of thumbing his nose at Islamic thugs.

Hillary would be a dhimmi president who loathes our military.

If it comes down to a choice between Hillary and Rudy, I'd hold my nose and vote for Rudy because of that one issue.

 

39 posted on 10/24/2007 4:34:40 AM PDT by peyton randolph (tag line taking a siesta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Those who insist on Rudy will be responsible for a Hillary presidency.

I’ll not vote for Rudy in the general for any reason.

Have you looked at that list of what he represents?

You’ve got Hunter and Tancredo as real conservatives; you’ve got Thompson and Huckabee as 80 percenters; you’ve got Romney as a 60 percenter.

Why would you give in to the media brainwashing and let everyone know you’d support a blatant liberal?


40 posted on 10/24/2007 4:45:04 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain. True support of the troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson